[css-display] Confusing list-item note #1470
Labels
Comments
triple-underscore
added a commit
to triple-underscore/triple-underscore.github.io
that referenced
this issue
Jul 6, 2017
Commits on Jul 6, 2017 Note that 'display: contents' does not affect property inheritance. Fixes w3c/csswg-drafts#1473 w3c/csswg-drafts@356b3296d5b20e00bedbfa8d1db59 d005a73bfc9 Normatively define what was in the previous note: that run-in fixup occurs before first line determination. w3c/csswg-drafts@37c01a4ef94aec7c352c3dc7c5cfc 31f8898ed4d Move computed value bullet before box generation bullet. w3c/csswg-drafts@5d10db8d8665f52994530304f2ddc 88236d37ccb Clarify that run-in fixup occurs before block/inline fixup. w3c/csswg-drafts@6f6913e20851f50ad81ca3cb43a49 9c01e8b2186 Expand out informal definitions of BFC. Also fixes w3c/csswg-drafts#1471 . w3c/csswg-drafts@388b1fb3bfa7dbe2ed112581322d2 a10787c9121 Refer to 'flow layout' directly, rather than just mentioning the types of boxes that flow layout can produce. Fixes w3c/csswg-drafts#1470 . w3c/csswg-drafts@09212af80e10e4e3e57965bb27b2d e3fdcd86e06 Make the run-in recursion explicit, so it's clear the second step doesn't recurse. Fixes w3c/csswg-drafts#1460 . w3c/csswg-drafts@c9f1bb16d0e5077b9bca7027a7d72 52eeff5abf1 Be a little looser about what counts as abspos, because css-lists defines as out-of-flow. Fixes w3c/csswg-drafts#1458 w3c/csswg-drafts@f7ff60660c3b5e1b31000ffa0f729 ba04f13a2f8 Remove the w3c/csswg-drafts#1390 inline issue. w3c/csswg-drafts@4514b3e7f2f0aa8ef95a84c107fb9 90fc2def209 Add note about the two categories of box-tree fixup, and their relative ordering. Fixes w3c/csswg-drafts#1355 . w3c/csswg-drafts@f5b79e99bb8fc9ebea4ed956ed342 0bc69b90786 Apply diff, per resolution. Fixes w3c/csswg-drafts#1118 . w3c/csswg-drafts@dbb7042481d132efcb6869ecbdf44 f338d8ad944
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
When I read a sentence like "X can only be an A, a B, a C or a D", I expect A, B, C and D to be pairwise disjoint. However, CSS Display has this note:
This is confusing because
I would simply say
Also note the grammar allows run-in list items. Maybe
run-in flowandrun-in flow-rootare already covered by "inline box" and "inline-block" ("block container" in my proposal), respectively, but it's not much clear.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: