User talk:YFRag

June 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. HurricaneEdgar 15:11, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. HurricaneEdgar 15:12, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision diffs
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. fist of all, pls use edit summary thanks. HurricaneEdgar 15:24, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

February 2024edit]

Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Vlad the Impaler, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please review WP:IPCV as well. DonIago (talk) 17:16, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

@Doniago Hello, I don't quite understand? The song is in the Wikipedia article on the album and is titled "(Vlad) The Impaler" what more proof do you need? Do I need to link to a different site stating the exact same thing? YFRag (talk) 17:21, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Per WP:IPCV, you need to provide a secondary source as a means of establishing that this reference to Vlad is considered generally significant in some manner. The metaphor I like to use is that we need to prove not just that the tree fell in the woods, but that it made a sound when it fell. Hope this helps! DonIago (talk) 18:40, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

@Doniago Honestly I don't care enough to look for secondary source to prove that a song called "(Vlad) The Impaler" is about Vlad the Impaler or wether or not that specific song had a noticable impact. I just remembered why I don't edit anymore. All this work for half a sentence. YFRag (talk) 19:04, 28 February 2024 (UTC)