Jump to content

Talk:Il dio vagabondo/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Ffranc (talk · contribs)

Reviewer: Otuọcha (talk · contribs) 23:45, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[]

It's wonderful and I approved to review this article. I am relatively a new user though I understood and have read almost if not all about editing and reviewing. This is also my first review and hope that I will do my best. I am happy to be reviewing this article and will ask almost in some basis. I also have a good knowledge of English language. I will be enquiring and be instructing on a better way which you can also agree or not agree with clear reason. Please do mark done, fixed or working at the end of any of my reviewing question and suggestion by placing ** under mine. I will mark done to generally accepted ones (e.g: the edit warring before adding to the "GAHybrid" down;

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Lead

[edit]

Grammar

[edit]

Publication

[edit]

Reception

[edit]
  • Tonio Troiani of Fumettologica called Il dio vagabondo an improvement from Gauguin: The Other World, because it manages to be a solid work without being disturbed by its technical refinement and many references. Troiani wrote that it combines Dori's three passions—art, classicism and pop—and retains a lightness despite its postmodern games, resulting in a comic that recalls the works of Hayao Miyazaki and Baru [fr; it].[2] Troiani wrote that its treatment of divine beings and modernity is reminiscent of Neil Gaiman's American Gods and Martin Heidegger's theology in the interview "Only a God Can Save Us: can be made clear. I am not in support of the spreading writing (segmental even). Just pick the major acclaim for the book.
    • Tonio Troiani reviewing/writing for Fumettologica called the book, an improvement from Gauguin: The Other World.He wrote that the book manages to be a solid work without being disturbed by its technical refinement and many references. He wrote that it combines Dori's three passions; art, classicism and pop and still retains lightness despite its postmodern games, resulting in a comic that recalls the works of Hayao Miyazaki and Baru [fr; it]. He also praised the book as a reminiscent of Neil Gaiman's American Gods and Martin Heidegger's Only a God Can Save Us (you can copy this one. All the Best! Otuọcha (talk) 03:19, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[]
      • Done
  • The image of the poet is fine but can there be another image, maybe of the poem? If not, it's well just the caption. Change Friedrich Hölderlin's poem "Bread and Wine" from 1801 is quoted in the book to Title originated from "Bread and Wine", a poem by Friedrich Hölderlin
Painted portrait of Friedrich Hölderlin
Some lines from Friedrich Hölderlin's poem "Bread and Wine" are quoted in the book.

Thundering they approach. And meanwhile it seems to me often
Better to sleep than as now to be so companionless,
Waiting like this; and what’s to do and to say in the meantime
I do not know, and what poets are for when times are hard.
Yet they are, you say, like the holy priests of the wine-god,
Moving from land to land, on through the holy night."

— Quoted lines from "Bread and Wine",
English interpretation by Susan Ranson [1]
  • The book is not named after the poem; see above. I don't know about having the poem as a picture. I tested using {{stack}} and {{poem quote}}, but it becomes too crammed and too much.

References: general layout

[edit]
  • I am doubtful of using sources from Amazon like you did in source 9, 11, 12 and 13. Please change to a better source or even remove when none is found. All the Best! Otuọcha (talk) 02:46, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[]
    • WP:RSPAMAZON says: "Amazon is a reliable source for basic information about a work (such as release date, ISBN, etc.)" It's used here for release dates, and since it's the only English-language source I could find, it's preferable per WP:RSUEC.

Thank you for the review, Otuọcha. I have addressed each of the points above to the best of my capability. Ffranc (talk) 15:00, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[]

  • I have checked the images and they all beat good ones and (alt): just a suggestion.
  • Well written
  • The ref layout was super and per review above, the Amazon link is cited well. No fault.
  • It's broad and focused on the book
  • No issue of WP:NPOV
  • No Copyvio, checked per copyvio detector
    • After this clear need, I found no reason to hold the article. Once more, bravo to you Ffranc; and keep up the good work. I will also advice more work even for FA. All the Best! Otuọcha (talk) 14:20, 24 March 2024 (UTC) Pass[]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.