Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Y-Mag (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 12:47, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Y-Mag

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Y-Mag
• Articles for deletion/Y-Mag (2nd nomination)
• Articles for deletion/Y-Mag (3rd nomination)

Y-Mag (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The magazine fails the general notability guideline. There is little coverage in independent, reliable sources (Google search) and the ones provided are mainly due to its closure, failing the one-event notability guideline. DrStrauss talk 19:53, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Please note that the one-event notability guideline refer to persons not publications or organisations.--MickeyDangerez (talk) 10:21, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 21:13, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 21:13, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

• Keep: Well known(in its era), and notable(history), magazine in South Africa.--MickeyDangerez (talk) 10:18, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

• Comment: could you provide sources to show this please? DrStrauss talk 19:06, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSandDoctor (talk) 17:38, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Courtesy ping @MickeyDangerez:--TheSandDoctor (talk) 17:39, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

• Delete. Does not satisfy WP:NMEDIA MassiveYR ♠ 22:55, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSandDoctor (talk) 16:56, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.