Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Von Kantzow
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Nomination withdrawn. No delete vote. PeaceNT 02:22, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[]
Bump from speedy. No opinion. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-17 20:36Z
Delete no sources, obvious COI (see talk page), no assertion of notability (besides being a member of royalty). Nardman1 20:41, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[]- COI is an issue but in general not a reason to delete. "Member of royalty" seems like a pretty big assertion of notability. Can you evaluate it? —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-17 20:50Z
- I can't find any sites which specifically comment on this family. If Sweden's nobility system is anything like England's, there are many such families with minor claims to nobility, ie a hereditary title linked to a landed estate. Obviously the titles are now mostly ceremonial. The only even minorly notable member of this family I can dig up information on is Carin von Kantzow and she acquired the surname only through marriage. Nardman1 21:32, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[]
- This family is on the List of Swedish noble families. The article just needs a bit of cleaning up and tagging to put in the right category. I could do it later I suppose. Nardman1 21:41, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[]
- I can't find any sites which specifically comment on this family. If Sweden's nobility system is anything like England's, there are many such families with minor claims to nobility, ie a hereditary title linked to a landed estate. Obviously the titles are now mostly ceremonial. The only even minorly notable member of this family I can dig up information on is Carin von Kantzow and she acquired the surname only through marriage. Nardman1 21:32, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[]
- COI is an issue but in general not a reason to delete. "Member of royalty" seems like a pretty big assertion of notability. Can you evaluate it? —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-17 20:50Z
- Keep and cleanup. Nardman1 21:44, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[]
- Done. And I suppose since I added the speedy in the first place, could I be permitted to withdraw the nomination? PS: thanks for the motivation to clean the article up. Nardman1 22:28, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[]
- Keep and cleanup per Nardman1. -- Chairman S. Talk Contribs 21:49, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.