Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Van Wert High School
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Dismissed because AFDed too soon; no prejudice against renomination. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-25 08:21Z
- Van Wert High School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Article does not assert the notability of the school Seinfreak37 15:15, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[]
- KEEP Article was nominated for deletion ONE MINUTE after creation. Article was flagged as a Stub and not given any chance to develop. Article has already since been updated a bit further. EagleFan 16:32, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletions. -- Part Deux 15:50, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletions. -- Part Deux 15:53, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[]
- Speedy keep. Article not given a chance to develop (renominate after some days/a week if the issue persists). AfD'd in 1 minute. -- Black Falcon 00:54, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[]
- Delete. (a) I don't find the alumni argument convincing, and it is not part of Wikipedia's policy ( schools proponents' views notwithstanding ), (b) the article is inadequately reference/sourced, and (c) the article was created by someone who has been going along creating schools articles on a regular basis without then asserting or demonstrating notability. I don't have a problem with individual articles being created and then giving them time to grow, but this particular article is part of a whole group, many of which display the same pernicious pattern. It would be better for EagleFan to create articles on one school at a time, and work on them till they meet our standards, rather than simply impose his preference for inadequately documented schools articles on the project as a whole. As Wikipedia editors we all surely want high quality articles: we are not well-served by the bulk creation of low quality articles. WMMartin 14:07, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[]
- Speedy keep. This was nominated for deletion one minute after creation? Seriously? Talk about biting the newcomers. (jarbarf) 00:29, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[]
- Keep all high schools are inherently notable, as I argue here, but this one also has several interesting alumni. Noroton 19:01, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.