Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United States Air Force Web Posting Response

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 16:11, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[]

United States Air Force Web Posting Response[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I believe this fails WP:NOTHOW How US Airmen reply to blogs is an internal USAF function and not something you would expect to find in an encyclopedia An orphan article, nothing reaches here anyway Gbawden (talk) 09:56, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:16, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:16, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:16, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[]

Delete. Good grief, the stuff people put on Wikipedia! Utterly and completely non-notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:40, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[]

Delete No reason to think that this internal guideline is notable (and the USAF is far from being the only government agency to issue its staff with guidance on this kind of topic) Nick-D (talk) 02:41, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[]

Delete This may be notable, but there's nothing in the current sources suggesting it is. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:35, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.