Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Three Point Capital (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 17:34, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[]

Three Point Capital[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NORG notably WP:ORGDEPTH nothing of note added since it's last nomination for deletion. Domdeparis (talk) 13:14, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 13:53, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 13:53, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[]

Keep Has received substantial coverage in reliable independent spirces for example Variety. FloridaArmy (talk) 14:18, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[]

Variety is the only in depth coverage in a RS. The notability criteria require multiple sources. Did you find others? Domdeparis (talk) 15:03, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[]

Comment FloridaArmy, that Variety reference actually fails WP:RS since the journalist states he is merely repeating unattributed gossip - "Three Point Capital, which is providing debt financing for the boxing movie “Tiger,” is expanding by hiring Eric Fischer to open offices in Ohio and Kentucky, Variety has learned exclusively.". Leavng that aside, the reference relies entirely on quotations from an exec VP and the final paragraph is standard information and description provided by the company which can be also found in various forms in other announcements and even on their website. Reference fails WP:ORGIND and/or WP:CORPDEPTH. HighKing⁺⁺ 19:31, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[]

Delete - no sense of any improvement to notability since the last AfD. No evidence of notability. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 19:31, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[]

Delete -- Fails WP:CORPDEPTH & WP:TOOSOON; sources are routine, WP:SPIP, etc. Being on a list of "25 companies [you] should know" is not an indication of notability -- quite the opposite. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:57, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[]

Delete Agree with nom and others above. No indications of notability, fails GNG. References fail WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 19:31, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.