Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suzanne LaFleur (artist)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:34, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Suzanne LaFleur (artist)[edit]
- Suzanne LaFleur (artist) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No demonstration of notability. Struggling to find any independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources - lack of WP:SIGCOV. Fails WP:BIO and WP:NARTIST. Promotional article, created by a WP:SPA. Edwardx (talk) 21:20, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:49, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:49, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete, though the deletion rationale is rather harsh considering there is a list of awards and LaFleur claims to have exhibited internationally (well, Kuwait). However, I can't find any reviews of her exhibitions online, or coverage about her (apart from a photo in Broadway World). The awards don't seem to be significant, from non-notable galleries/museums. This article was declined as a draft at AfC but the author decided to publish it anyway. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST at the moment. Sionk (talk) 22:53, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:37, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
- Weak delete: agree with @Sionk that subject is not without claims to potential notability or merit. I just don't think she has arrived there yet -- too soon as they say. Quis separabit? 23:24, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:33, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:33, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.