Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rough Music: Blair, Bombs, Baghdad, London, Terror

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Mz7 (talk) 03:27, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Rough Music: Blair, Bombs, Baghdad, London, Terror

Rough Music: Blair, Bombs, Baghdad, London, Terror (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to be notable. I've been scrubbing around trying to find references to confer notability, but I'm striking out. That seems odd, as this kind of book usually generates a pretty big splash in the press, but it seems like this one just hasn't. Mikeblas (talk) 10:52, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 20:25, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

• Keep As the good-faith creator and main contributor, I would have appreciated the courtesy of notification. Regardless, I obviously believe this article should be kept. It was published around a decade ago, and many internet sources would have been deleted. I will endeavour to find two reviews etc to meet WP:NBOOK. AusLondonder (talk) 08:30, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Sources found:

• • Arena magazine
  • Current Issues in Criminal Justice Journal

AusLondonder (talk) 08:34, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. AusLondonder (talk) 08:37, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 15:44, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:42, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

• Keep - It looks like the book merited a scholarly review in Current Issues in Criminal Justice, as stated above, as well as references in multiple later books that touch upon multicultural political issues in Britian (see, for example, here). The author himself is certainly a notable British writer who's held multiple controversial opinions on a wide variety of topics. I feel inclined to think that we shouldn't delete the article. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 10:14, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
• Keep as this seems acceptable. SwisterTwister talk 06:12, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
• Keep, there may not be a ton of sources, but there appears to be enough to confer notability. Kharkiv07 (T) 00:59, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.