Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rommel Nobay

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. NawlinWiki 01:50, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Rommel Nobay

Rommel Nobay (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Filing a frivolous lawsuit that was dismissed does not constitute notablity as far as I can see. Delete. DMG413 00:47, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

• Strong Delete While "a family of begging lepers had given him half their earnings to help put him through school." is... curious, it's hardly a valid claim to notability. Neither is filing suit when you're called out on your BS application padding. Caknuck 02:54, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
• Comment This may be a notable individual, the Daily Princetonian article backs up key claims, and claims not backed up can be deleted. However, the New York Times article only covers the marriage. Need a second source clearly evidencing notability in order to keep. --Shirahadasha 03:03, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Even if more sources are presented the fact he sued Princeton is not very notable. Intinn^Talk! 10:48, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per above.Nomen Nescio^{Gnothi seauton} 12:41, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete or merge with Princeton University. dcandeto 16:31, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete WP:BIO and a person who sued someone, there could be thoudsands more article on wikipedia about people who have sued, respecfully - what makes this special.Tellyaddict 16:37, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
• Comment I would argue that Nobay's absurd exaggerations make him a pop-culture curiosity of the same category as Aleksey Vayner, whose entry is not being considered for deletion. - Gforce1977 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Gforce1977 (talk • contribs) 01:30, 1 March 2007 (UTC).
• 'Comment That article isn't being discussed here. See also: WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Intinn^Talk! 08:45, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.