Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quinn Nystrom

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 15:52, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[]

Quinn Nystrom[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I think this is a case of WP:TOOSOON. She does not meet notability guidelines for politicians, as she has only held local office and has not received national coverage - only local/regional coverage. Obviously, if she were to win the upcoming election, she would be considered notable and the article could be re-instated. Jmertel23 (talk) 12:30, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Jmertel23 (talk) 12:30, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. Jmertel23 (talk) 12:30, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[]

Delete being a candidate for congress is not a sign of notability. Wikipedia is not a platform for campaign brochures we do not create articles on people before elected except in very, very rare cases with very large coverage which this is not.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:10, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[]

Delete - all SIGCOV is from local sources. Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 21:44, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[]

Delete. This is a case of WP:TOOSOON. She fails WP:NPOL because she is an unsuccessful candidate. If she gets elected in November, then she can get an article. LefcentrerightDiscuss 23:22, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:43, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[]

Delete as WP:TOOSOON, being a candidate not enough, and WP:NOTPROMOTION, WP is not a publicity vehicle. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:46, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[]

Delete per above.--Mpen320 (talk) 21:36, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[]

Delete failed candidates do not meet WP:NPOL. If she wins in November, we can re-address. Bkissin (talk) 17:17, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[]

Delete, without prejudice against recreation on or after November 3 if she wins. As always, Wikipedia is not a free PR platform for aspiring future officeholders to publicize or promote their campaigns — the notability test for politicians is holding a notable political office, not just running for one, and candidates who do not have preexisting notability for other reasons independent of the candidacy are not entitled to be included here unless and until they win the seat. Bearcat (talk) 18:29, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[]

Delete per Bearcat, but currently it is WP:TOOSOON. NavjotSR (talk) 10:19, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.