Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Fabian

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Bucketsofg 21:04, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Patrick Fabian

Patrick Fabian (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Delete - does not appear to pass WP:BIO. Otto4711 23:01, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

• Strong Keep. Enough substainal credits and has appeared in a number notable acting projects. QuasyBoy 13:18, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Recurring roles look notable enough, just. WMMartin 21:48, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. Meets the commercial endorsements criteria in WP:BIO. Phleg 04:45, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

• Acting in a commercial does not make for a "commercial endorsement." Unless he is identified by name (a la Alex Trebek for Colonial Penn or Lindsay Wagner for Sleep Number beds) he doesn't have "commercial endorsements. Otto4711 18:24, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

• Keep Meets BIO with adequate references. --Kevin Murray 23:19, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

• Question - what references are you referring to? The article is sourced by IMDB, another wiki and TV.com which do not meet WP:RS. Otto4711 00:29, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

• Otto, give it up! --Kevin Murray 08:06, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

• Well, no, I'm not going to "give it up" on your say-so. Your the one who wants to keep the article, that makes it your obligation to properly source it. Otto4711 08:10, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

One among four. Why am I the target of your ire? --Kevin Murray 17:59, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

• Are you a joke or a pest? You're AfD submissions are weakly stated and overturned like clockwork. Go write some articles! --Kevin Murray 08:43, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

• First off, please don't edit my or others' comments by inserting your editorializing in the midst of them to subvert their meaning. I have removed your inserted comment from mine. Secondly, "you're" is a contraction of "you are." The word you're feebly struggling for is "your." Third, if you have references for this unreferenced article, then add them to the article. Just saying "keep" in an AfD means nothing. Finally, stop being a dick.

• I know that I shouldn't feed trolls, but seeing you melt down is kind of fun. Keep up the good humor! Cheers. --Kevin Murray 17:56, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

• Keep. He does has credentials. Robert Moore 20:14, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.