Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Supranational (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. And furthermore, I hereby nominate the By number of wins table for the Edward Tufte special award for Data presentation abuse above and beyond the call of duty. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:38, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[]

Miss Supranational[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has existed for some time without any references. A small number of references were found at the previous AfD, but these have approaching zero coverage of the event series as they are 'local girl made good stories' rather than indepth coverage. Not eligible for PROD. Stuartyeates (talk) 00:32, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Panama-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:49, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:49, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:49, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:49, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[]

Leaning delete - I'm not convinced that this pageant is absolutely notable. However, I have to observe that if it IS deleted then there will be significant fallout - this article has a lot of roots stretching out as shown in its templates: Template:Miss Supranational, and the winners at Template:MissSupranationals will be on shaky ground, except probably Mutya Johanna Datul. The only other significant winner page, Karina Pinilla, shows she only won this one. A lot of the links in Template:MissSupranationalCountries are debatably not official Supranational deciders. Essentially, I don't care for these tits and teeth articles, but I'm trying to be even handed here - and I'm sorry, I don't see compelling evidence of notability. Just getting in my two cents before this discussion inevitably disintegrates...but hey ho... at least there'll be an eventual decision either way at the end of the tunnel. Mabalu (talk) 11:22, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ymblanter (talk) 06:48, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:41, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[]

Comment - Wow. I can't believe the lack of interest in this AFD. I was expecting drama and chaos of every description but it looks like nobody really cares about this pageant - which is pretty remarkable given that its deletion would effectively invalidate and wipe out at least three templates, several winner bios, and all the offshoots I mentioned above. I would have to say that even though I wouldn't cry if this was deleted, I think something with so many roots and offshoots really needs more discussion than has been seen in this AFD. It's not just an isolated or standalone page. Mabalu (talk) 16:43, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[]

Miss what? Never heard of. Delete. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 21:17, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.