Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lockwood Analytical Method for Prediction (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 07:05, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[]

Lockwood Analytical Method for Prediction[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Much of this is over my head, but searching for sources, I find references to Lockwood's book, plus check the history for the edit I reverted, seems to be pushing the book. I tagged for notability almost two years ago, not much has changed. This seems like primary research that hasn't been been subject to much review. Lots of mentions and listings, but not so much sigcov. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | WER 14:26, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[]

Delete. There may be some future for an encyclopedic article on this, but the article as it stands is simply a list of bullet points promoting the method. No indication of significance or notability, though some detailed research by an expert in the subject could demonstrate that. -Xpctr8 (talk) 15:44, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:53, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[]

Delete. Wikipedia is not an instruction book. There is a case to be made for Salt. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:18, 27 July 2014 (UTC).[]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.