Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kinism (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --Coredesat 07:56, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[]
Kinism[edit]
Article on some not notable crazy right group. Article had been deleted once before, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kinism. --LC 12:54, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Comment I know nothing of these apparent scum, but I think that if nothing else the page needs to have a criticism section and information from other sources. ~AFA ʢűčķ¿Ю 12:59, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[]
- Delete. The website returns "system offline", most ghits are blogs or similar. Is this much more than a neologism? BTLizard 13:21, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[]
- Delete as a neologism, unless extensive non-trivial references are provided. --kingboyk 18:52, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[]
- Delete. I think this is a real, though very small, movement. However there are too few reliable sources to allow us to write about them in a neutral manner. For that reason they do not appear to be sufficiently notable. -Will Beback · † · 20:57, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[]
- Delete religioncruft. JuJube 22:59, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[]
- Delete unsourced neologism and non-notable fanatical group. Fails WP:V Ohconfucius 09:19, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[]
- Either keep or merge with Christian Reconstructionism It appears fairly notable. Merging with Reconstructionism would be my 2nd choice as Kinism seems to be a rather unique varition. --The President of Cool 22:26, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.