Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremy Freese

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 10:22, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[]

Jeremy Freese[edit]

I am neutral on this article's deletion, but there appears to be a failure of WP:PROF. Let consensus decide. Crockspot 00:01, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[]

Delete I can't find any evidence of notability. MarkinBoston 01:47, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[]

Delete There is no evidence of notability here. The subject in question has not published a significant and well-known academic work. The person's collective body of work is also not significant and well-known as well. --S iva1979^{Talk to me} 02:01, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[]

Delete - non notable content. -- Anonymous Dissident^Talk 02:30, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[]

Delete Professor Freese has yet to establish himself as an encyclopedic worthy sociologist. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.155.209.251 (talk) 02:41, August 25, 2007 (UTC)
Delete per Siva1979.--Voxpuppet 03:08, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions. —David Eppstein 03:29, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[]

Delete per above. Ward3001 00:26, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[]

Delete - Not notable and entry seems to be nothing more than self-promotion for his web site 144.90.123.189

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.