Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jela Krečič
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. – Juliancolton | Talk 01:40, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
- Jela Krečič (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Classic case of WP:BLP1E: got a degree, got a higher degree, interviewed a notable person, got a job. That's that. Fails WP:GNG by doing so; no depth of coverage. So far, this is WP:UNDUE for her career. WP:JOURNALIST also requires more substance than we have here. O Fortuna!...Imperatrix mundi. 21:06, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. WP:TOOSOON. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 21:13, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete, pending evidence of non-trivial coverage from reliable publications. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 00:49, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:05, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:05, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Slovenia-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:05, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.