Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inspirada
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:32, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[]
Inspirada[edit]
- Inspirada (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No sources, only the website link to the neighborhood's page. Also the neighborhood is unfinished yet is stating what each part of the neighborhood has. I vote delete per WP:N and WP:CRYSTAL due to the lack of sources to verify anything, which qualifies it as speculation. Bobby122 Contact Me (C) 03:53, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[]
- Delete, no sources, not notable. --Nuujinn (talk) 13:15, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[]
- Delete Fails WP:CRYSTAL; besides, unsourced neighborhoods are generally not notable. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 21:46, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:58, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.