Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/In2Musica

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:36, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[]

In2Musica[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The company lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. The are no reliable sources in the article. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:29, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:29, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lebanon-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:29, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[]

Delete -- an 'in-house' vanity label. No indications of notability or significance and no SIGCOV. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:35, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:59, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:04, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[]

Delete Fails GNG and WP:NCORP, no indications whatsoever of notability. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 19:32, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.