Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gilles Saint-Hilaire

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sam Walton (talk) 08:49, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[]

Gilles Saint-Hilaire[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Having some patents, a personal taste for self-promotion and regular IP runs across WP to spam his Quasiturbine invention (20 years old next year, still no real independent coverage) is not enough to mee WP:BLP. Andy Dingley (talk) 18:37, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:24, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:24, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:24, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:24, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[]

Delete. Promotion, WP:FRINGE (doesn't appear to be pseudoscience, but non-mainstream invention), no independent sources. —David Eppstein (talk) 03:59, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[]

Delete The refs are mainly by him, not about him, and some of them are of unknown reliability. Any other links I found (e.g. [1] turned out to be by him. No one else seems to have written about his inventions. LaMona (talk) 06:02, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.