Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fort-15
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. None of the "delete" commenters have explicitly indicated whether their !votes are to be taken to apply to the Fort-5 article as well (and its nomination is rather buried in the discussion), so although I'm going to delete it, I'll restore it upon request. Deor (talk) 11:37, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
Fort-15[edit]
- Fort-15 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Completing nom for IP User:2.60.102.76, whose edit-summary rationale was "there are not a single source - I have a proposition to delete this stub-article". Ansh666 11:45, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. A.Minkowiski _Lets t@lk 11:54, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Firearms-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:35, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
- Keep, this is not a valid reason for deletion. Managed to find one reference which confirms technical data in article.TheLongTone (talk) 14:34, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
Weak KeepDelete,may not be notable enough for its own article, possible merge to RPC FortThere is not much thast can be moved to the parent article.--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 16:46, 17 June 2014 (UTC)- Question - is Modern Firearms considered as a reliable source? I don't tend to touch articles that have it as a ref or external link, but I just saw that this one has an entry there. Asked on WT:WikiProject Firearms as well. Also, bundling this article in:
- Delete...Not in production, appears to be in the glossy brochure stage...the only source for this pistol states that "the future of this pistol is still uncertain".--RAF910 (talk) 03:45, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 12:28, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete -
Not even... it appears to be a fictitiousnot notable gunfrom a game called S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Shadow of Chernobyl http://stalker.wikia.com/wiki/Fort-15
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 21:59, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.