Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ed Reams

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-03-01 08:00Z

Ed Reams

Ed Reams (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Non-notable and vanity; please see article text and history. Takeel 03:39, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

• Delete Lack of an attempt to assert notability (unless every TV production staff member is notable by default...) and a lack of reliable sources leave the article devoid of any encyclopedic value. Leebo⁸⁶ 03:46, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. John Reaves (talk) 04:10, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom.--Dwaipayan (talk) 06:22, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. No assertion of notability --† Ðy§ep§ion † ^{Speak your mind} 07:11, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom Travelbird 08:23, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Keep I userfied the one line he wrote. However, Ed Reams is mentioned on the WHSV article as the director. BuickCenturyDriver (Honk, odometer) 12:09, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. A TV station director is rarely going to meet the primary notability criterion, and this one certainly doesn't. A Train ^{take the} 16:32, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete no sources, no attempt to assert notability, fails WP:BIO.--– Dakota 23:59, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
• Comment He was formerly a reporter at TV-3 (a dab page), if that means anything to anyone. John Vandenberg 13:52, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.