Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duri Pulo, Gambir

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:20, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Duri Pulo, Gambir

Duri Pulo, Gambir (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This stub is basically a mirror of the Wp:id stub http://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duri Pulo,_Gambir,_Jakarta_Pusat - it has no evident WP:N, WP:RS or WP:CITE to justify a stub. The higher level article about Gambir should contain the information. SatuSuro 06:14, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

• Keep All populated places are notable. Lugnuts (talk) 08:15, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
• Comment you have to be kidding - find something that justifies WP:N, WP:RS, for such low level populated areas, Gambir is notable not its component parts SatuSuro 09:23, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:56, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

• Keep Per long-standing AfD precedent, verifiable populated places are notable, partly because Wikipedia functions as a gazetteer and partly because sources can almost always be found for these articles. TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 07:07, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
• keep real place gets kept. these places are sufficiently important to Indonesia to merit their own post codes; what does the nom have against them? Carlossuarez46 (talk) 05:34, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
• Redirect to Gambir, Jakarta - were this an independent community, it would be a WP:SNOW keep per WP:OUTCOMES. However, it is not - it's a subdivision/neighbourhood of Jakarta, and, as such, should be redirected to the city it is actually part of. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 09:42, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.