Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Gilman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 23:55, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[]

Dan Gilman[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a city councillor in a city not large enough to confer notability on its city councillors per WP:POLITICIAN. While this article isn't as badly sourced as some of the others I've listed, with four legitimate footnotes and one bad one it's still not sourced enough to actually put him over WP:GNG. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 04:17, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:30, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:30, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[]

delete All the sources are local.--114.81.255.40 (talk) 11:25, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[]

Delete Pittsburgh does not pass the notability threshold.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:57, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.