Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daša Radosavljević

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Michig (talk) 08:18, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[]

Daša Radosavljević[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. No independent sources given. The Banner talk 14:39, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:04, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:04, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:04, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[]

Comment. According to Miss Serbia, runners-up at that context are the country's representatives at Miss Universe and Miss Earth competitions. Of course, there is a news coverage about the event, such as [1], and I can dig only a little more about Radosavljević (e.g. some coverage here [2], plus sites like missology.com). The thing is, how do we generally treat beauty pageants such as this one? Probably all entries from Category:Serbian beauty pageant winners (outside of Category:Miss Serbia winners‎) should have the same treatment. No such user (talk) 13:07, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[]
- They will be treated the same: all have to show notability supported by reliable sources conform WP:RS. The Banner talk 15:39, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 12:14, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[]

Delete as no evidence of notability fails GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 15:12, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[]

Keep. I've added a reference to the text in respectable Politika ([3]) which prominently covers Radosavljević. Vanjagenije (talk) 19:39, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[]

Keep This article subject has significant coverage in the Politica reference here [4], and also coverage at [5]. WordSeventeen (talk) 19:07, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[]

Delete. Now that I think about it, it's a classic case of WP:1E. The lady became a beauty pageant, was in most news for one day, and will be forgotten soon. Nothing of lasting significance is asserted in the article, and is probably not there. No such user (talk) 22:18, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:40, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.