Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cavaliers–Celtics rivalry

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 18:20, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[]

Cavaliers–Celtics rivalry (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG with lack of significant coverage in multiple, independent sources. The biggest issue is that it fails the guideline WP:WHYN, namely that multiple sources are needed "so that we can write a reasonably balanced article that complies with Wikipedia:Neutral point of view". Otherwise, editors will just cherry-pick facts from routine coverage in recaps of individual games or series, as opposed to independent sources that look at the rivalry as a whole. Moreover, routine coverage liberally uses the term rivalry to manufacture hype. There could be a personal rivalry with LeBron James and Boston, but that includes his time with Miami as well.[1] Recent coverage might try to generate animosity because of Kyrie Irving's trade from Cleveland to Boston. —Bagumba (talk) 11:26, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. —Bagumba (talk) 11:28, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 15:58, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 15:58, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.