Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anivarya Kumar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 15:56, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[]

Anivarya Kumar[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable self-published author; fails WP:AUTHOR —Lucas Thoms, formerly My Ubuntu (talk) 00:57, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:57, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:57, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[]

Delete A locally recognized person with local coverage, not a notable author. Her next book may actually get reviews, and she then may be notable, but she is not yet.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:53, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[]

Keep: She has published her book at Amazon Kindle and iBookstore which are both internationally recognized. Even Fox10 News is a national TV channel.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sherri789 (talk • contribs) — Sherri789 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Please read this guideline about the criteria for an author to be considered notable. Also, her coverage on Fox10 is not in-depth enough to be considered a notability-conveying source for her.—Lucas Thoms, formerly My Ubuntu (talk) 23:22, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[]

Keep: The references shown are significant and she is a published author who also has an upcoming novel.— Preceding unsigned comment added by WriterKevin (talk • contribs) — WriterKevin (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Keep: I remember seeing her on an international channel in London. She is the first one ever to publish a book at international level at the age of 12.~~— Preceding unsigned comment added by WriterChristian (talk • contribs)~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.9.138.11 (talk) — 12.9.138.11 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Keep: I remember seeing her on international channel in London. She is the first one ever to publish a book at international level at the age of 12. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChristianSeb (talk • contribs) 06:44, 27 June 2014 (UTC) — ChristianSeb (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. []

Keep: Looks like it is in talks with Disney and Pixar for a Disney Channel movie. I am so looking forward to such a movie from Disney - a Kids movie actually written by a young kid. It would definitely be the first, ever. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DannyMooreCanada (talk • contribs) 07:03, 27 June 2014 (UTC) — DannyMooreCanada (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. []

I can't find any evidence to support the claim that this is being considered for a movie. Tchaliburton (talk) 19:03, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Davey2010 • (talk) 14:58, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[]

Delete This is a self-published book without significant coverage. Fails WP:GNG and WP:AUTHOR. Tchaliburton (talk) 19:00, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[]

Delete Easily fails WP:AUTHOR and WP:NOTABILITY. Self-published with little coverage. If there really will be a Disney movie this is still WP:TOOSOON. The "Keeps" above seem to be from SPAs. --Jersey92 (talk) 20:58, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[]

Delete - Good luck to her on her career as a writer, however, she does not meet the guidelines for inclusion on Wikipedia at this time. -- Whpq (talk) 15:49, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.