Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Million Points of Light

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-02-26 08:46Z

A Million Points of Light

Previous discussion at WP:DIGI has lead us not to create Digimon episode articles. 90% of the info is fancruftily unencyclopedic, even for digimon (and especially in light of the current reorganization of articles Circeus 13:36, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[]

Edit for deleting admin: Please also delete redirect Digimon 02: Series Finale Epilogue.Circeus 02:05, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[]

Delete, digicruft. That many fair-use images in an article can't be good, either – Qxz 14:36, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[]

Delete unless we have an article about [1] (a Salvation Army fundraiser with decent news coverage; see [2]) or the general concept of those "pixels-for-sale" websites, in which case redirect there. cab 22:21, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[]

Delete, silly otaku obsession over character's futures that don't even factor into the main series -_-; —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Indiawilliams (talk • contribs) 23:55, 21 February 2007 (UTC).[]
- Good point. We don't need yet another outlet to those silly pairing wars.Circeus 02:03, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[]

No Opinion -- episode itself is a very important part of the series, but the article as it is is listcruft. Maybe a complete rewrite? JPG-GR 03:06, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[]

Delete per nom and above. Individual Digimon episodes just aren't notable, and articles about them would have major source issues and be magnets for extreme cruft and OR. -- Ned Scott 05:02, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletions. -- Ned Scott 05:12, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[]

Delete per nom. --`/aksha 08:35, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[]

Delete because of the deleted article End of the Line which was also an episode. x42bn6 Talk 17:46, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[]

Major Keep Isn't this AN IMPORTANT PART OF THE SERIES? Whoever posted that last post should go jump off a cliff. I haven't even HEARD of that episode anyway. 72.35.34.145 01:20, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[]
- Being important to the show is far different from being important or useful to Wikipedia or the average reader. This has nothing to do with liking the show or not, or anything of that nature. Also, End of the line was the English dub title for the last episode of Digimon Frontier. -- Ned Scott 01:54, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[]

Keep I wrote this article because I had not realised earlier that there was an epilogue in the final episode to each of the characters. The articles for each character included a written epilogue which didn't say where the information was found. I googled it and learned the epilogue was in the final episode. I wasn't sure if it was appropriate to create a page just for the epilogue so I created an article for that episode. Isn't the ending of the characters important too? I found it strange that I couldn't even find picutures of the future of the characters on wikipedia. This is my first time editting wikipedia so I probably messed up when I uploaded the pictures..

I didn't mean to start pairing wars but the episode seemed pretty clear as to who married who, and who is left open ended (did I mess up that part?). I also created it because I thought it was important to show that each of the kids achieved their goals. (ChloeSong 19:55, 23 February 2007 (UTC))[]

- My "pairing war" comments had nothing to do with you. If you look at Tai, Kari, T.K., Matt, Sora, or even mimi's pages' histories,you'll find PLENTY of instances of people inserting pairing stuff that is outright wrong. That page would just be another magnet for that. Circeus 23:29, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.