Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2021 BRSCC National Formula Ford 1600 season
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 03:45, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
2021 BRSCC National Formula Ford 1600 season[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- 2021 BRSCC National Formula Ford 1600 season (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Incredibly minor event that does not appear to meet the WP:GNG. Only one (probably) independent source (Formula Scout) whose suitability for usage on Wikipedia has been called into question by other editors in other discussions. HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 22:13, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Motorsport-related deletion discussions. HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 22:16, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, while Formula Scout is a good source for additional detail, I do not believe it can be used to establish notability. Sources as they stand do not pass GNG, and a Google search does not return any significant coverage. As an aside, there appears to be a great deal of articles on minor motorsport series which unambiguously fail GNG (such as this one), and a fair few which could easily pass but are incredibly poorly-sourced (e.g. most FIA F4 seasons) and do not contain additional information beyond results tables.
5225C (talk • contributions) 02:01, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwaiiplayer (talk) 12:11, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwaiiplayer (talk) 12:11, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:08, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:08, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, fails GNG, per above comments Formala Scout is not a strong enough source to establish notability. Devonian Wombat (talk) 03:39, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.