Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2014 Dolpo police crackdown

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 07:15, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[]

2014 Dolpo police crackdown[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Surely this fails WP:NOTNEWS. Nothing in this article indicates long term notability Gbawden (talk) 12:12, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:49, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:49, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:49, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:49, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[]

Keep - article needs some formatting etc. but notable subject through plenty of sourcing.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:26, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 01:22, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[]

Delete - I can't read the last source listed, but other sources portray the admittedly tragic event as something worth mentioning, but not of lasting importance. Sadly, it's listed as merely one incident with respect to problems with the yarsagumba trade. --Larry (talk) 03:09, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[]

Delete – In agreement with Larry and nominator. Fails WP:NOTNEWS and not of lasting importance. United States Man (talk) 04:30, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[]

Delete. Per nom and the above !votes. Non-notable event of no enduring historical significance. Philg88 ^♦talk 05:03, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.