User contributions for 70.183.60.2

20 December 2022

• 22:3422:34, 20 December 2022 diff hist +263‎ User talk:70.183.60.2 ‎ →‎Edit warring at Great Barrington Declaration: Reply current Tag: Reply

18 October 2022

• 20:3220:32, 18 October 2022 diff hist +160‎ User talk:70.183.60.2 ‎ →‎Edit warring at Great Barrington Declaration: Reply Tag: Reply
• 15:2115:21, 18 October 2022 diff hist +34‎ Great Barrington Declaration ‎ Your talk page is the equivalent of the Fox News comment section. The only "neutral" stance would be to correct bias and indefinite language in favor of a more expansive explanation of the different viewpoints. Instead you wrote a hit-piece, and I've noted that those leftists demanding acquiescence in the talk page are the editors losing it because someone had the gall to correct subtle political bias in a important argument. Tag: Reverted
• 14:5914:59, 18 October 2022 diff hist +38‎ Great Barrington Declaration ‎ I didn't even realize you morons were engaged in such a silly discussion. Lol. The talk page reveals no consensus has been reached. Your side is simply insisting some things are "trash" then sourcing political op-eds. Tag: Reverted
• 14:4014:40, 18 October 2022 diff hist −6‎ Great Barrington Declaration ‎ hahah Tags: Manual revert Reverted
• 14:3914:39, 18 October 2022 diff hist +192‎ User talk:70.183.60.2 ‎ →‎Oct 22: Reply Tag: Reply
• 14:3614:36, 18 October 2022 diff hist −6‎ Great Barrington Declaration ‎ Report me :). I explained recently why I would no longer contribute money to this online encyclopedia - the incredible and disheartening amount of bias woven throughout just about every article posted. You're tripping over referring to "herm immunity" as a concept rather than a "fringe notion." Herd Immunity is a scientific theory, fringe notion is political labeling. Tags: Manual revert Reverted
• 14:3014:30, 18 October 2022 diff hist +466‎ User talk:70.183.60.2 ‎ →‎Oct 22: Reply Tag: Reply
• 14:2714:27, 18 October 2022 diff hist −6‎ Great Barrington Declaration ‎ Political Bias masquerading as informed consensus. Reducing subtle biases only make the overall argument stronger. Tags: Manual revert Reverted
• 14:2014:20, 18 October 2022 diff hist +305‎ User talk:70.183.60.2 ‎ →‎Oct 22: Reply Tag: Reply
• 14:1514:15, 18 October 2022 diff hist −6‎ Great Barrington Declaration ‎ The guardian is not a scientific source. Herd Immunity is a well founded scientific theory which should be considered on a case by case basis. This is clear political bias. Several of the citations in this article are linked to opinion pieces rather than hard scientific research. Tags: Manual revert Reverted
• 14:0814:08, 18 October 2022 diff hist −6‎ Great Barrington Declaration ‎ focused protection is not a "fringe" notion, a term that lacks any meaningful, non-biased definition. Tag: Reverted

24 August 2016

• 16:2616:26, 24 August 2016 diff hist +71‎ Nicholas Porter Earp ‎ →‎Moves to California
• 16:2416:24, 24 August 2016 diff hist 0‎ Nicholas Porter Earp ‎ →‎Wyatt Earp