User contributions for 76.6.213.65
Appearance
Results for 76.6.213.65 talk block log logs global block log filter log
25 June 2024
- 11:5711:57, 25 June 2024 diff hist +13 WFMZ-TV clarify
- 11:0811:08, 25 June 2024 diff hist +123 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Single-edit IPs vandalizing Ashley Gjøvik page: Reply Tag: Reply
- 10:5210:52, 25 June 2024 diff hist −4 Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase Small edit for technical privacy reasons
- 10:5110:51, 25 June 2024 diff hist +796 Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase Reverted by mistake. Undid revision 1230907717 by 76.6.213.65 (talk) Tag: Undo
- 10:5110:51, 25 June 2024 diff hist −796 Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase Small edit for technical privacy reasons Tag: Reverted
- 10:1710:17, 25 June 2024 diff hist +15 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Single-edit IPs vandalizing Ashley Gjøvik page
- 10:1610:16, 25 June 2024 diff hist +1,070 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Single-edit IPs vandalizing Ashley Gjøvik page: Reply Tag: Reply
- 10:0810:08, 25 June 2024 diff hist +402 User talk:Augmented Seventh →IP hopper on that Gjøvik article: new section Tag: New topic
- 10:0610:06, 25 June 2024 diff hist +384 User talk:Augmented Seventh →Please stop hounding and misusing talk pages: Reply Tag: Reply
- 09:5009:50, 25 June 2024 diff hist +322 User talk:2600:1702:3890:1940:5CF7:1314:DC8F:6F9 →ip hopping: Reply current Tag: Reply
- 09:3909:39, 25 June 2024 diff hist +536 Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase →Ashley Gjøvik: Reply Tag: Reply
- 09:3009:30, 25 June 2024 diff hist −361 Ashley Gjøvik This reference was added twice; consolidating. Maybe happened while someone was trying to make it look like the info hadn't already been cited here, but it had.
- 09:1809:18, 25 June 2024 diff hist +50 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Single-edit IPs vandalizing Ashley Gjøvik page
- 09:1209:12, 25 June 2024 diff hist +429 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Single-edit IPs vandalizing Ashley Gjøvik page: Reply Tag: Reply
- 09:0609:06, 25 June 2024 diff hist +403 N User talk:66.146.183.70 →June 2024: new section current Tag: New topic
- 09:0509:05, 25 June 2024 diff hist +386 N User talk:2600:8801:1201:7200:F591:D785:87AF:8613 ←Created page with '{{subst:ANI-notice}} ~~~~' current Tag: New topic
- 09:0509:05, 25 June 2024 diff hist +386 N User talk:2600:8801:2994:4900:2152:83C8:74DE:959D ←Created page with '{{subst:ANI-notice}} ~~~~' current Tag: New topic
- 09:0409:04, 25 June 2024 diff hist +403 N User talk:208.114.45.83 →June 2024: new section current Tag: New topic
- 09:0309:03, 25 June 2024 diff hist +2,630 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Single-edit IPs vandalizing Ashley Gjøvik page: new section Tag: New topic
- 08:3408:34, 25 June 2024 diff hist −68 Ashley Gjøvik ce
- 08:3308:33, 25 June 2024 diff hist −144 Ashley Gjøvik ce
- 08:3208:32, 25 June 2024 diff hist +390 Ashley Gjøvik I edited this because it was misleading as written. Reinstating but more concisely. Tag: possible unreferenced addition to BLP
- 08:2908:29, 25 June 2024 diff hist +234 Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase →Ashley Gjøvik: Reply Tag: Reply
- 08:2908:29, 25 June 2024 diff hist +607 Ashley Gjøvik Plain vandalism; the sources aren't even in the lede and the edit summary is a lie. Undid revision 1230891925 by 2600:8801:2994:4900:2152:83C8:74DE:959D (talk) Tags: Undo possible BLP issue or vandalism possible unreferenced addition to BLP
- 08:2808:28, 25 June 2024 diff hist +489 Talk:Ashley Gjøvik →Manufacturing vs R&D: Reply Tag: Reply
- 08:1608:16, 25 June 2024 diff hist +38 Ashley Gjøvik Reference this footnote from here too
- 08:1208:12, 25 June 2024 diff hist −5 Ashley Gjøvik move sources next to what they describe; ce
- 08:0608:06, 25 June 2024 diff hist +29 Ashley Gjøvik ce
- 07:5407:54, 25 June 2024 diff hist +15 Ashley Gjøvik Clarify that the car project/Titan is defunct
- 07:5207:52, 25 June 2024 diff hist −1 Ashley Gjøvik ce
- 07:5007:50, 25 June 2024 diff hist +287 Ashley Gjøvik This is misleadingly written in that it seems to imply most of the lawsuit was just thrown out; the actual situation is considerably more complicated Tag: possible unreferenced addition to BLP
- 07:3907:39, 25 June 2024 diff hist +384 Talk:Ashley Gjøvik →A word on off site canvassing and the request to prohibit IP edits: Reply Tag: Reply
- 07:3807:38, 25 June 2024 diff hist +159 Talk:Ashley Gjøvik Elaborate
- 07:3607:36, 25 June 2024 diff hist +612 Talk:Ashley Gjøvik →Sockpuppet IPs "contributing" to this article: new section Tag: New topic
- 07:3307:33, 25 June 2024 diff hist +1,027 Talk:Ashley Gjøvik →Manufacturing vs R&D: new section Tag: New topic
- 07:2907:29, 25 June 2024 diff hist +60 Ashley Gjøvik Per Bloomberg, cited: https://web.archive.org/web/20240624213511/https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-03-19/apple-is-said-to-develop-displays-to-replace-samsung-screens "Apple… is designing AND PRODUCING its own device displays … using a secret MANUFACTURING FACILITY near its California headquarters to make small numbers … for testing purposes"
- 07:2507:25, 25 June 2024 diff hist +223 User talk:76.6.213.65 →June 2024: Reply current Tag: Reply
- 07:0907:09, 25 June 2024 diff hist +34 Ashley Gjøvik Regardless, that might have been too verbose for the lede.
- 07:0707:07, 25 June 2024 diff hist +37 Ashley Gjøvik MicroLEDs *ARE* semiconductors. Undid revision 1230883040 by 72.238.180.66 (talk) Tags: Undo Reverted
- 07:0607:06, 25 June 2024 diff hist −15 Ashley Gjøvik Accidentally reverted my own edit. Undid revision 1230882760 by 76.6.213.65 (talk) Tag: Undo
- 07:0507:05, 25 June 2024 diff hist +15 Ashley Gjøvik Again, very misleading prose here. And should just cite a page number instead of the judge's quote, which is routine. Tag: Reverted
- 07:0207:02, 25 June 2024 diff hist 0 Ashley Gjøvik WP:NPOV violation here is astounding. One RICO claim is under (a), one under (c). And the (d) claim relies on both. So about half of it was dismissed, hardly "most". The Apple fanboys editing this article need to GTFO
- 05:5905:59, 25 June 2024 diff hist +34 Ashley Gjøvik The other EFNs specify group so these probably should too
- 05:5305:53, 25 June 2024 diff hist +32 Ashley Gjøvik correct this down here too
- 05:5205:52, 25 June 2024 diff hist +13 Ashley Gjøvik ce
- 05:5105:51, 25 June 2024 diff hist −15 Ashley Gjøvik You can't hide in a footnote that the "dismissed with prejudice" claim wasn't actually dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. C'mon, man!
- 05:4805:48, 25 June 2024 diff hist −18 Ashley Gjøvik ce
- 05:4805:48, 25 June 2024 diff hist +196 Ashley Gjøvik I'm seeing another source say the RICO was dismissed with leave to amend so until that's sorted out, this needs a CN. Also it was put in the lede by an IP making other suspicious, unsourced edits. Finally, since the remaining undismissed claims center around the environmental complaints, that needs to be in the lede
- 05:3705:37, 25 June 2024 diff hist +1 Ashley Gjøvik ce
- 05:3605:36, 25 June 2024 diff hist −41 Ashley Gjøvik This EFN cites the other EFN which is pretty unworkable. Combine them.