User talk:Philipnelson99

This is Philipnelson99's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, so please add it to your watchlist.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

This talk page is archived.
To browse the archives, press "Show" and select the month of posts you want to view.

2018 — Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2019 — Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2020 — Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2021 — Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2022 — Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2023 — Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2024 — Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #149 is out: Creating tests is now much easier!

There is a new update for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it!

In this issue, we discuss our progresses with tests and how it is easier to make them, and we take a look at the latest software developments.

Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check our archive!

Enjoy the reading! -- User:Sannita (WMF) (talk) 12:22, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[]

Jimmy Savile sexual abuse scandal

Hi, I'm not the IP you've reverted but I am not sure I agree with your revert. 'Crimes' seems a reasonable way to phrase it and in any case I think some of their edits are uncontroversial and should not be reverted, like removing his first name in subsequent mentions. Jtrrs0 (talk) 20:14, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[]

@Jtrrs0 I think you're mistaken. My revert removed deliberate vandalism. Philipnelson99 (talk) 21:04, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[]

Thank you

Hello Philipnelson99, and thank you for your edits to combat the editor currently engaging in edit war in the Black Sea slave trade-article.

The editor Someone Qırımlı are currently engaging in persistent vandalism of the article. They edit the article both from anonymous IP-adresses, as well as from their account, which had barely been used for anything than for editing this article.

They erase and remove referenced information describing the slave trade of the Crimean Khanate, referring to everything descriging the slave trade as non neutral "Russian propaganda", and either erase the entire topic from the article, or replace it with content describing the slavery as benevolent.

I wonder if the article can be protected somehow, or if the user can be blocked from edititing it? They clearly violate the rules of bias, vandalism and edit warring, but as a contributor I mostly write, and and know less about what can be done in these situations. Perhaps you have more knowledge as how do adress this? I have limited time dealing with this (I am travelling soon). My best greetings--Aciram (talk) 13:14, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[]

PS: They now also appear to emply a sock puppet: AzaqQara.--Aciram (talk) 13:22, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[]