User talk:Indon
Archive 1 (05/09/06) · Archive 2 (06/10/06) · Archive 3 (03/11/06) · Archive 4 (06/12/06) · Archive 5 (31/12/06) · Archive 6 (05/02/07) · Archive 7 (27/02/07) · Archive 8 (29/03/07) · Archive 9 (22/04/07) · Archive 10 (20/06/07) · Archive 11 (30/08/07) · Archive 12 (11/10/07) ·
Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end.
Start a new talk topic.
If you come here because of my vandal warning messages from your talk page, then don't bother. I will directly remove your post. | |
If you come here because one of your links or your ad contents were removed, then please learn what Wikipedia is not. I will terminate linkspams on the spot. | |
If you come here to tease my blood pressure, then waste yourself somewhere else, you stinky troll! | |
If you come here to discuss about improving Wikipedia to be the best Encyclopaedia on earth, then I'd be happy to talk to you anytime. |
However,....
Talk Archived
— Indon (reply) — 04:51, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
Seas and Oceans
Akanemoto has been adding those links to 100s of articles. I already removed a few from Indonesia. I counted 11 seas/oceans in Indonesa - i bet there are more. Thus he would create 11 info boxes for indonesia. He doesn't seem to realise we removed them. I wonder if anyone else has questioned him on it?? --Merbabu 05:00, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
- I've left him a message. All those infoboxes are so stupid and uninformative. — Indon (reply) — 05:02, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
GA
Hey how are you? Really, I am jealous of you, you have got two GAs!!! Hehehe, oh well, I can reach your accomplishments if Religion in Indonesia is GA as well. So, can you help me (by creating the map :P). Hehehe, sorry for that. But really, you are really a great editor. Good luck and take care!! -- Imoeng 06:05, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
- Haha, no problem. And many thanks for that. Take care -- Imoeng 09:01, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
Culture of Indonesia
Hi. You can revert all the changes if you like. It doesn't bother me. But my stomach ache does. Though my edits might not have been helpful, the lead needs improvement. Rintrah 10:17, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
Kejawen dan lain lain
My honours degree supervisor had done his PhD on one of the groups :) SatuSuro 14:34, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi Indon,
Thank you sincerely for your attention to Taiwanese aborigines. You made many changes; so many that I could not address them one-by-one. I'm afraid that with great reluctance I reverted your edits, but only so that we could discuss them on the article's talk page.
Thanks again!--Ling.Nut 16:03, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
- HI again, Indon,
- Of course I want you to contribute to the article! Please don't think I don't value your contribution. And I see your point about redundancies. You just made so many changes, and some of them were not about redundancies. I would like to discuss them one by one, or at least by small groups of related changes, on the article's talk page. Thanks --Ling.Nut 17:20, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
- I'm sorry that my reversion of your edit offended you. It may have seemed like a drastic move. I tried to compensate for that by explaining clearly my reasons for reverting, and leaving several doors open (in several different forums) for us to discuss things further. If you decide not to contribute further to Taiwanese aborigines, I wil regret the loss of your input, but I will repsect your decision.
- Best regards,
Licence of Image:214761890 86afa3ab56 m.jpg
Is there a particular reason why you changed the licence of Image:214761890 86afa3ab56 m.jpg? The uploader seems to be the same person that uploaded it at flikr; this is a scaled down version; it was licenced as cc-2.5 at wikipedia, and the same picture, albeit a larger version, was licenced cc-nc at flickr. Now you assumed that the image was uploaded from flickr to wikipedia... but this is just an assumption. Judging by the uploader's contribution and user page, it's the same person, the original photographer. And he licenced the photo cc-2.5 here. --Qyd 16:44, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
Metallica article
Why did you place so many citation needed tags in the article when there are clearly some statements that do not need references. With your logic, there would be a citation needed tag after every sentence. I would just like an explanation on why you placed those citation tags (I am probably wrong, but I just do not see how some of those sentences need to be cited). Thanks a lot. Wikipediarules2221 07:03, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
- Alright, I see your point. If it is consensus that those comments need citations then forget I said anything. I just thought some of them were over the top. Carry on and keep up the good work. Cheers! Wikipediarules2221 22:17, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
WikiProject Indonesia Newsletter
|
|
|
If you prefer to get a link to the next newsletters instead of receiving them, please add your name to this list.
Wikibreak
Hey I am fine, how are you? No lol, it has nothing to do with the map. As I said, I haven't got much time as for doing things as usual, and its getting somewhat worse :(. However I do realise the project needs maintanence, so every two weeks, I will log in and update stuff, including newsletter. Now by that time, you should tell me what has happened :P. No, only joking, I will "watch" people's contributions. Oh yeah, about the map, no harm right? Can you still finish it? :P. I'll check that when I am back, hehehe. Alrighty, good luck and take care -- Imoeng 20:02, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Image:Vlocity_interior.jpg
Thanks for bringing the copyright issue re Image:Vlocity_interior.jpg to my attention, it was a good of my part...