User talk:Tetraktys/Archive 3

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Tua fotografia

Uma fotografia tua foi usada por um site da Finlândia: File talk:Santacrocefachada.jpg. Abraços! Dantadd✉ 23:04, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

File:Thomas Gainsborough Boy in blue.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Nikbot (talk)) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Nikbot (talk) 07:02, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

RE

Olá, Tetraktys. Fique à vontade para reverter às versões anteriores se considerar que estavam melhores. O objetivo não era, entretanto, "falsificar" o estilo. Especificamente no caso da obra de Almeida Júnior, sou obrigado a discordar de você. Ao menos no meu monitor, a imagem anterior (também carregada por mim) não faz juz ao brilho, às cores e sequer à varição da luz típicas dos interiores de Almeida Júnior. Aliás, todas as cores pareceram-me distorcidas, do verde azulado da toalha da mesa (que está marrom) até o vermelho da almofada (que também está marrom), e a típica "opacidade" dos interiores de Almeida Júnior nada tinha a ver com a opacidade forçosa dessa imagem. Acho que seria melhor procurar uma outra imagem para substituí-la, já que o upload de Garabombo refere-se a outra obra, e não a do MNBA.

Quanto a imagem de D. João VI, concordo com você, não reparei no efeito sobre o rosto do personagem, embora a imagem, mesmo sendo muito menor, apresente os contornos mais lineares. Abraço, Dornicke (talk) 21:56, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

PS - Talvez seja bom tentar fazer algo com a versão anterior da obra de Almeida Júnior. Acabo de ver que a imagem atual possui algumas falhas em relação à anterior no canto inferior direito. Mas os tons estão muito ruins! Mal se percebe a variação de luz, até as sombras estão opacas... tá parecendo fotografia de catálogo da década de 70, rs. Dornicke (talk) 22:08, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
Vou tentar revertê-las (já consegui algumas vezes, dá um pouco de trabalho). Se consegui, te aviso, abz, Dornicke (talk) 01:28, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Revertidas

Também vi as três aqui em São Paulo, em uma exposição patrocinada pelo Banco Santos (e a do Almeida Júnior também na Brasil+500). De toda forma, todas foram tiradas do catálogo "Imagem e Identidade", com obras do MNBA, que traz muitas das versões reproduzidas também no catálogo Safra, mas com variações bem marcantes de tons e cores. A obra de Pedro Américo, em especial, está bastante próxima da imagem do catálogo (aliás, todas as modificações que faço visam deixar as obras mais próximas da fonte original, tentando amenizar a perda natural de brilho e contraste que ocorre com toda obra escaneada), com tons acinzentados (passa longe do vermelho) e brilho intenso (o quanto os editores do catálogo mexeram nas imagens, já não sei...) Mas confio no seu bom senso, e, de toda forma, creio que utilize essas imagens mais do que eu. Abz, Dornicke (talk) 01:56, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

File:Reggio calabria museo nazionale della magna grecia.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Reggio calabria museo nazionale della magna grecia.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

-93.144.188.53 10:08, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

File:To prince edward island.jpg

Hello Tetraktys. Canada applies the term of "life of the author plus 50 years from death" for release of copyrights, but Colville is still alive today. So, as the license states that "the copyright holder releases..." etc, then NeoThe1 (the original uploader) should be Colville himself, something that I really doubt. Probably it's a falsely-licensed upload from the early days of Wikipedia (2004). Howerver, if you like, I can restore the image and nominate it for deletion so that we can get more opinions. Regards, Badseed talk

I restored it, let's see:) As for the site, well, i think you should proceed with caution, because the "free use" that appears on the Library of Canada is rather generic and not always sincere. Take a look at Category:Images from Library and Archives Canada, and the discussion at the mailing list (includes mail from the LIbrary). Cheers! - Badseed talk 00:26, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

File:US mural.jpg

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

  • Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
  • State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
  • If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
  • Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
  • Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 00:32, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Tetraktys!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:11, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Thank you

Hi, there. Thanks for cleaning up File:Vasco da Gama - 1838.png. Much appreciated. Anrie (talk) 10:57, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Veii Apollo

Hallo. Unfortunately we are not allowed to publish any pictures of any objects in the Museo di Villa Giulia in Rome. See the discussion here: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Village_pump/Archive/2008Nov#Sopraintendenza_ai_Beni_Culturali_dell.27Etruria_meridionale Sorry.

Furthermore, I do not have a picture of this statue, since you are not allowed to take pictures while visising the museum.

Sorry again. --User:G.dallorto (talk) 17:41, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Omphalos Apollo

Hi Tetraktys. I'm quite sorry, the file had been renamed by BetacommandBot. I assumed incorrectly that the renaming had been spread to Wikipedias. I have checked CommonsDelinker's log and will restore the missing links (thress pages on pt:). Again, my apologies. I should have checked. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 11:17, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Done. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 11:22, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
I'm not sure I understand correctly your remark. User:G.dallorto requested the renaming, User:BetacommandBot took care of it. I deleted what I took to be a now-duplicate with no use. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 16:03, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Sagrado coração de jesus.jpg

File:Sagrado coração de jesus.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--Hekerui (talk) 14:36, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

congratulation for this pictures

very beautiful pictures! --prosopee (talk) 18:55, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

File:Daudelin-odalisque.jpg

File:Daudelin-odalisque.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--Stifle (talk) 10:28, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

file:Apoxyomenos01 pushkin bb.jpg

Thanks for wonderful thing you did with my picture! Very charming! $)--Shakko (talk) 21:15, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

File tagging File:01268-Henrique-Fuhro---Sem-.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:01268-Henrique-Fuhro---Sem-.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:01268-Henrique-Fuhro---Sem-.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Herr Kriss (talk) 20:49, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

File:01268-Henrique-Fuhro---Sem-.jpg

I understand you, but you have to have written permission. This is Commons rule. Anyways is really director copyright holder, not a photographer? Herr Kriss (talk) 21:34, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

I'm not the one who created the rules, so it's don't depends on me. I trust you, but that's not enough. Herr Kriss (talk) 16:28, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

File:Jacob de Senleches - Fuions de ci.ogg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 03:37, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

File:Johannes Ciconia - O Padua, sidus praeclarum.ogg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 01:20, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

File:David_de_Michelangelo_2.jpg

File:David_de_Michelangelo_2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Dcoetzee (talk) 09:02, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Tradução

Com gentileza, você poderia criar essa página? (en:Freedom of Panorama). E escrever em português brasileiro? Eduardo P (talk) 20:26, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Australian aboriginal art.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Australian aboriginal art.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Australian aboriginal art.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Quartl (talk) 06:04, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

File:Tumba de Gregório XV - Le Gros.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 06:18, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Gregório XV - Le Gros.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 06:18, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Parabéns

Dos seus talentos de escrita já eu sabia há algum tempo, mas só agora, por acaso, descobri os fotográficos, o que é algo que (suponho) saberei identificar melhor, pois a fotografia é o meu hobbie mais antigo e persistente. Um pouco ao acaso, pois fotos excelentes é o que não falta na sua galeria, estou muito impressionado com File:Praia da cal ao crepúsculo.jpg e todas as do Museu Arqueológico Nacional de Atenas. Eu passei lá um dia inteiro vai para um ano e até estou satisfeito algumas das das fotos que lá fiz, mas babo-me de inveja (positiva :-) ao ver as suas. Um abraço. --Stegop (talk) 19:07, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

O equipamento não é nada de especial: uma Olympus E-300 já com mais de 5 anos, com o zoom de origem 14-45 e um Sigma 10-20. Sds. --Stegop (talk) 19:54, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
Embora há muitos anos que seja um fã da Olympus, possivelmente se fosse agora não compraria Olympus, por duas razões. Uma é que o CCD é mais pequeno que o das outras, o que, além do possível maior ruído (tenho a impressão que o ISO 200 da minha, já velhinha, tem mais ruído do que ISO 400 de Canons e Nikons de baixa gama), é mau para quem, como eu usa e abusa de grandes angulares - o meu zoom 10-20mm é equivalente a um 20-40mm numa reflex de filme de 35mm, enquanto que numa Canon ou Nikon seria equivalente a 15-35mm. A outra razão é que há muito poucas lentes "3rd party" e embora acredite que as lentes Olympus teem uma excelente relação qualidade/preço, custa-me estar a dar umas mais umas quantas centenas de Euros para ter um aumento de qualidade que muito raramente se vai notar. À parte disso, estou muito satisfeito com ela. O mais provável é que as coisas tenham mudado muito, mas na altura em que a comprei lembro-me de ter lido em mais do que um sítio grandes elogios às cores, supostamente imbatíveis dos CCD's da Olympus. Não foi por isso que a comprei - foi um daqueles impulsos que podia ter corrido mal, mas tinha prometido a mim mesmo que só me passaria para o digital quando as DSLR's baixassem dos 1000 Euros e quando fui levantar as fotos e slides de uma viagem ao Egipto, não resisti, em vez de trazer só as fotos, trouxe também a máquina - estúpido! devia tê-la comprado antes da viagem! --Stegop (talk) 01:16, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Lamento saber da sua pouca sorte. Acontece aos melhores... Mas embora não me admire muito do ruído em interiores, é uma surpresa saber que as fotos ao sol também ficaram estragadas - sempre pensei que era nessa situação que se notava menos as diferenças entre CCD's (sensores). Lembro-me que uma das coisas que me irritou mais por não ter comprado uma câmara digital antes de ir ao Egito foi ver que as fotos tiradas pela minha irmã numa HP bem mixuruca ficaram melhores do que as digitalizações caseiras dos meus belos slides da minha fiel OM4. Se não escolher uma reflex, tente ver qual é a dimensão do CCD das que mais lhe agradam, pois quanto mais pequeno é o sensor, mais ruído será de esperar - não quer dizer que um sensor maior seja garantia de menor ruído, mas não há volta a dar à Física: para tecnologia semelhante, o ruído é inversamente proporcional à área do sensor! Há uns anos também li algures que é má ideia comprar uma câmara com muitos pixéis com um sensor pequeno, pois quanto mais pixéis tem, maior é o ruído. O problema é que como toda a gente associa nº de pixéis a qualidade, possivelmente agora não há máquinas com menos de 10M. Boa compras e boas fotos! --Stegop (talk) 03:02, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tetraktys/Archive_3&oldid=659216245"