User talk:Юрий Д.К.

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Юрий Д.К.!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 10:26, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Archives /FOP and DW warnings

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 02:15, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Many thanks! Юрий Д.К. (talk) 12:38, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Flickr2Commons

edit]

I have just come across a few images you have recently uploaded from Flickr. I would appreciate it if in the future, you used the Flickr2Commons tool. This tool allows images to be moved to Commons from Flickr without having to download the images to your own computer. It also brings in the largest resolution of the image, as well making sure to list the correct license and url, making it easy for the automated Flickr Review system. Also, it is fairly easy to categorize images with this tool. To use it, you just need to go to the url and authorize it (where it says "authorise first").--A1Cafel (talk) 16:56, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

• Hi! I prefer UploadWizard extension. It also allows to upload original-resolution files directly from Flickr (only for autopatrollers - up to 500 files) and blocks duplicate uploads (while F2C not always). But maybe I will use F2C for more massive downloads (above 500 files). Thank you! Юрий Д.К. (talk) 17:21, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Welcome, Dear Filemover!

edit]

---

Hi Юрий Д.К., you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

• Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
• Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
• Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

rubin16 (talk) 11:40, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

• Thank you, Rubin16! Юрий Д.К. (talk) 07:43, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

Charles Patrick Ewing Flickr photostream

edit]

Hi Юрий Д.К. - please be careful with uploading these; a lot of the photos (and maybe all?) are license-washed from other sites and are highly likely not the photographer's own work. Thanks! - MPF (talk) 21:26, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

• Resolved, no copyvios. Юрий Д.К. (talk) 00:49, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Реклама

edit]

Здравствуйте! Вот напоролся на рекламу: https://www.flickr.com/photos/197690669@N03/albums/72177720306226973 Я этот весь альбом залил. Можно её как-нибудь ботом удалить и.т.п... Да будет цвет (talk) 22:54, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

• Добрый вечер, сделано, но посмотрите, может что и пропустил. Юрий Д.К 15:30, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

  Спасибо! Да будет цвет (talk) 16:05, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

  Здесь ещё один такой: https://www.flickr.com/photos/197718094@N03/albums Да будет цвет (talk) 14:14, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

  • Я бы вообще его фотки не трогал, скорее всего они скачаны с других сайтов. Юрий Д.К 15:17, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

    У меня такое же впечатление. Да будет цвет (talk) 15:59, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Дата

edit]

Здравствуйте!

Вы можете пройтись ботом, чтобы исправить дату?

User talk:Rost.galis Да будет цвет (talk) 22:48, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

• Здравствуйте! Исправил те фото, к-рые загружены после 6 июня. По остальным участница не предоставила данных. Юрий Д.К 07:15, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

  Спасибо! Да будет цвет (talk) 09:47, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Пробел

edit]

В названиях этих фотографий отсутствует пробел:
File:Электропоезд Московского метро(52762302302).jpg
File:LeningradNovember 7 1976 (9585085741).jpg
File:LeningradNovember 7 1976 (9585085275).jpg
File:LeningradMay 9, 1977 (9696516306).jpg
File:LeningradMay 9, 1977 (9693287033).jpg
File:LeningradMay 9 1977 (10808918406).jpg
File:LeningradMay 9, 1977 (9696516144).jpg

• Я думаю, ничего страшного. Переименовывать только из-за пробела как-то нехорошо. Юрий Д.К 07:15, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

  Почему бы и нет? Да будет цвет (talk) 09:50, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

  Времени мало. Юрий Д.К 22:49, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Category:Photos by David Zhang

Hi Юрий Д.К., a request: would you, where applicable, please be so kind to add the {{Watermark}} tag to the David Zhang images you upload? They alle seem to contain credits in the image, which makes their use rather limited. Thanks for your understanding and regards, Wutsje 22:27, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

• Yes, I'll add as I finish the task. However, images are so big and so high-quality that watermark not a big problem at all. Юрий Д.К 22:30, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
  • Thank you. I agree that the quality of almost all of these photographs is very good (although their colours sometimes are a bit too saturated for my taste), but placing credits in an image like here or here is downright annoying. Wutsje 22:47, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
    • I having some troubles with VFC now, so I'll add template later. P.S. I very, very like bright colors and it is why this photoset take my attention ;-) Юрий Д.К 22:54, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

---

Unfortunatelly, VFC doesn't work. I've requested bot owner's help Юрий Д.К 14:45, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

Congratulations, dear license reviewer

edit]

If you use the helper gadget, you will find the links next to the search box (vector) or as single tabs (monobook). They are named license+ and license-.

Hi Юрий Д.К., thanks for your request for license reviewer status. The request has been closed as successful, and you've been added to the list of reviewers. You can now start reviewing files – please see Commons:License review and Commons:Flickr files if you haven't done so already. We also have a guide how to detect copyright violations. Potential backlogs include Flickr review and files from other sources. You can enable the LicenseReview gadget from Preferences.

Important: You should not review your own uploads, nor those of anyone closely related to you!

Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikimedia-commons ^webchat on irc.libera.chat. You can also add {{User license reviewer}} to your user page if you wish. Thank you for your contributions on Commons! Killarnee (talk) 18:19, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

• Thank you, @Killarnee: ! Юрий Д.К 18:22, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Pictures of the old building of the Parliament of Georgia

edit]

Pictures of the old building of the Parliament of Georgia (https://www.google.com/search?sxsrf=APwXEdcKGVKa8xPVmVo3IXyzqrlsI1aL1w:1686989582522&q=საქართველოს+პარლამენტის+ძველი+შენობა&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwir6bj27cn_AhVNVfEDHbvuCxEQ0pQJegQIChAB&biw=1920&bih=937&dpr=1#imgrc=hVi8E178Gi18mM). Wikipedia should add these pictures... Lasha-george (talk) 08:15, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

• I've uploaded public domain files but I don't want to upload all items as they may be unfree. Юрий Д.К 09:18, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

Categorization

edit]

Please remember to use the most specific categories possible when uploading images, and do not dump large numbers of files in broad categories like Category:California. Doing so creates cleanup work for other editors. Thanks, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:26, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

• Ok, I will not upload large numbers of images in broad categories when it is possible to use more specific cats. Юрий Д.К 09:50, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

Renaming Flickr-imported files

edit]

Hey, when renaming files imported from Flickr, please keep the redirect, as it will help not to create duplicates. Flickr2Commons only identifies files with the exact same name, so if the redirect is deleted someone may cluelessly upload a file that is already on Commons. Best regards, RodRabelo7 (talk) 13:34, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

• I've noticed that F2C doesn't detect duplicates when I try to download an album (detect only if file with exact name exist on Commons) but successfully detect them when I want to download an entire user's photoset or single image from Flickr (even if Commons file has another name). I think that we really need to enable duplicate detection in case of an album downloading. I've opened the theme on Commons talk:Flickr2Commons but still no response. Юрий Д.К 13:49, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

Flickr2Commons misuse

edit]

Despite warnings, you continue to misuse Flickr2Commons by uploading poor-quality images and files with poor titles, descriptions, and categorization. A sample from the last few days:

• File:Huntington Avenue in Sonw (15893346354).jpg: Misspelled title and description, no categories
• File:Lost (23713372054).jpg: Uselessly blurry; no useful title or description; lacking useful categories
• File:Herd on the march (20677798439).jpg: no useful title, description; lacking useful categories
• File:No unlesses (23503392795).jpg: nonsense title and description, no useful categories, and out of scope
• File:Why (26818683114).jpg: You added a single, overly broad category that does not actually identify what is in the image. You left a nonsense filename and useless description in place.

This is your final warning that you need to add useful filenames, descriptions, and categories to every single image you upload. (The filename and description on flickr are almost never useful - just leaving them is not acceptable.) If I see you continue to misuse Flickr2Commons in this manner, I will remove your access to the tool. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:40, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

• Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#User:Pi.1415926535 Юрий Д.К 07:20, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:'Charging Bull', Broadway, Manhattan, Feb. 2008 (2295717216).jpg

And also:

• File:'Charging Bull', Broadway, Manhattan, Feb. 2008 (2295723628).jpg

Yours sincerely, Elisfkc (talk) 20:00, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

Vienna?

edit]

Hi Юрий Д.К., any hint why this File:Poppyfield (25673110870).jpg should be in Vienna? And File:Pond (16360253634).jpg? Do you have location info? Herzi Pinki (talk) 13:21, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

• Hi! As the Flickr author of these files placed they to album "Shot in Vienna" I've added category "Vienna". Юрий Д.К 19:30, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

Yes, but Flickr is user generated content. You cannot trust. We only trust in user generated content if originated from Wikipedians :-) Maybe you could try to contact Thomas Hirsch via Flickr and clarify this with him. If you cannot clarify the location in Vienna, maybe it is better to remove this cat and assign categories on what is to be seen on the image, like poppy fields (not poppy fields in Austria, again too specific) or whatever the poles in the pond are correctly called. Regarding Category:Vienna: Vienna is a beautiful place worth visiting. Even if you only do it based on google street view or one of the numerous images well categorized and assigned to Vienna already. It is a pain to cleanup such categories like Category:Vienna full of poorly described and categorized images, a pain I would like to share with you. --Herzi Pinki (talk) 13:59, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Birds of Scotland - subcategories

edit]

Hi Юрий Д.К. - please avoid making lots of minute subcategories Category:[Species] in Scotland, unless the species already has huge numbers of files (e.g. Cygnus olor); it is better instead to create Category:[Genus] in Scotland or Category:[Family] in Scotland, and keep the files in their relevant Category:[Species], so that {Geogroup} mapping for the species category shows the entire natural range of the species, rather than the [range - Scotland]. Thanks! - MPF (talk) 20:19, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

• @MPF: Hi! Removing files from specific categories like "Pastor roseus in Scotland" and deleting categories with reason "Excessive subdivision of small parent category" (I don't remember such speedy deletion criteria) is not acceptable. See Modularity principle "file should be put in the most specific category". Also, I have no doubt that sooner or later we will still create categories like "Pastor roseus in Scotland" and later we will create "Pastor roseus in Glasgow", "Pastor roseus in Dumfries and Galloway" etc. due to large number of files. I think, we need to restore the categories. Regards. Юрий Д.К 20:41, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Eventually, yes, in about a century, when there are enough suitable files! At the moment, it just makes files very difficult to find if you have to go through dozens of subcategories to reach them. The whole point of categorisation is to make finding files easy, not to make it difficult. When a category reaches 200 files, then is the time to think about suitable subcategories. Remember too, birds are natural objects; human political boundaries mean nothing to them. So when considering new subcategories within a species, look for plumage features, or similar, rather than dividing by artificial human boundaries. MPF (talk) 20:49, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Заброшенные сады недалеко от Кургана Бессмертия 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 18:09, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Заболоченный берег Красивой Мечи у Стрелецкого моста2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:41, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Берег р. Красивая Меча - Ефремов2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Dust spot on the right --Poco a poco 20:41, 1 December 2023 (UTC) Agree. Fixed, thank you. Юрий Д.К. 22:58, 1 December 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:59, 5 December 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:02, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Берег р. Красивая Меча - Ефремов4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 16:39, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Поля у р. Красивая Меча, Ефремов2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK. --C messier 21:03, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Foggy sunrise in High Fläming Nature Park1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foggy sunrise in High Fläming Nature Park1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

FP Promotion

edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Foggy sunrise in High Fläming Nature Park2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foggy sunrise in High Fläming Nature Park2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

FP Promotion

edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Baths of Maria de Padilla, Alcázar of Seville.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Baths of Maria de Padilla, Alcázar of Seville.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Замёрзшая Красивая Меча, Ефремов.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 19:29, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Старый дом на ул. Комсомольская. Ефремов.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 19:29, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

FP Promotion

edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Panorama of Frankfurt with Ignatz-Bubis-Brücke at sunset.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panorama of Frankfurt with Ignatz-Bubis-Brücke at sunset.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

edit]

QICpromoted

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

• Sorry, this image isnt eligible for QI as rules only allow images by Commons Contributors. It has removed from the list Gnangarra 06:44, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
• @Gnangarra: Thank you, but I've not nominated this file for QI. I still don't know who did it. May be checking history of QIC page will help but I don't want to spend time. Юрий Д.К 06:48, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
  • I will follow that up, I was just letting you know as uploader of the change and why. Gnangarra 07:04, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

FP Promotion

edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Cuba - Cayo Coco.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cuba - Cayo Coco.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

edit]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Baths of Maria de Padilla, Alcázar of Seville.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support useful. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:37, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

FP Promotion

edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Nepal Yak - Himalaya trekking.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Nepal Yak - Himalaya trekking.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

FP Promotion

edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Endless hills of Pienza1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Endless hills of Pienza1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

FP Promotion

edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Utah Dunes Landscape - West Desert District.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Utah Dunes Landscape - West Desert District.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

FP Promotion

edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Азау-Гитче-Чегет-Карабаши.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Азау-Гитче-Чегет-Карабаши.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Archiving

edit]

Hi,

All FP nominations should be archived, not deleted. Your mistake has been reverted by another user. Please do not erase useful content -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:23, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

FP Promotion

edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2018 - May - Salzach River at night in Salzburg.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2018 - May - Salzach River at night in Salzburg.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

Категоризация

edit]

Пожалуйста, категоризируйте при загрузке Ваши работы точнее. Категоризация типа Крым это явно недостаточно. Спасибо.--Трифонов Андрей (talk) 19:45, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

• Раньше я так делал, теперь категоризирую лучше. Юрий Д.К 19:46, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

  Помогите разобрать фото Sergiy Galyonkin в категории Crimea. Геотегов нет, зацепок нет, я в замешательстве. Цель - в корневой категории Crimea не должно быть фото только подкатегории. Трифонов Андрей (talk) 20:35, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

  Хорошо, завтра гляну. Юрий Д.К 20:36, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

  @Трифонов Андрей: Я исправил файлы, до которых Вы не добрались. Уже давно для всех своих загрузок, тем более для моих работ ставлю точные категории, насколько я могу это сделать. Эта партия крымских фото одна из последних с такими широкими категориями. Сейчас проверяю свои старые загрузки, чтобы добавить точные категории, имена файлов и описания (в основном анонимно). Иногда участники Фликр удаляют свои фото, поэтому раньше приходилось иногда загружать больше фото, но в ущерб категоризации. P.S. Моих работ в категории Крым нет, только загрузки. С уважением. Юрий Д.К 14:35, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

  Спасибо, с полсотни вместе растащили. Быстро захламляется после каждого лета Трифонов Андрей (talk) 14:38, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Красивая Меча в вечерних лучах солнца.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 15:56, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Усадьба Шаховских — Красильщиковой.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Acroterion 16:29, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Общий вид Манежной площади со стороны Four Seasons Hotel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:19, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Здание Госдумы РФ со стороны ул. Тверская.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tilted a bit (хорошо бы немного повернуть вправо). -- --Екатерина Борисова 15:01, 20 May 2024 (UTC) @Екатерина Борисова: Добрый вечер, исправил, спасибо / Fixed Юрий Д.К. 15:51, 20 May 2024 (UTC)  Support A little lack of sharpness in full size view, but in general it is ОК --Екатерина Борисова 00:47, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ивановский пруд, Сосенское, Москва3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, but the branches up right are disturbing. Should be easy to stamp them out --MB-one 09:11, 23 May 2024 (UTC) @MB-one: Agree. Done. Юрий Д.К. 19:53, 23 May 2024 (UTC)  Support Good work --MB-one 09:09, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

Просьба проверить лицензии нескольких изображений

edit]

Здравствуйте, коллега! Не могли бы вы, пожалуйста, проверить лицензии данных изображений, которые были взяты с официального сайта Audiovisual Service Европейского Союза?

• File:Qanat Şarlapaev (2023-11-14).jpg
• File:Murat Nurtleu (P061051-486119).jpg
• File:Bolat Aqsolaqov and Kadri Simson (P060844-387028).jpg
• File:Nursultan Nazarbayev and Hans van den Broek.tif
• File:Jacques Delors and Aueskhan Kyrbassov.jpg
• File:P009056001H.jpg (этот опубликовался со своим оригинальным названием случайно, уже предложил на переименование)

Я сам лично немного сомневаюсь, и вправду ли свободные данные изображения, поэтому решил, что правильнее будет дать проверить лицензии человеку с нужными правами, и потом уже вырезать портреты для инфобоксов. Malik Nursultan B (talk) 14:12, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

• Добрый вечер! Я посмотрел, вроде всё чисто. Юрий Д.К 18:33, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

  Только заметил; спасибо большое. Malik Nursultan B (talk) 02:36, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Лобное место, табличка2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks a bit distorted due short distance, could be fixed by using Photoshop "Spherize" with -2 or something like that. --Plozessor 03:43, 23 May 2024 (UTC) @Plozessor: Thank for your review! I've fixed it Юрий Д.К. 19:57, 24 May 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 14:54, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Four Seasons Hotel Facade 2024-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Moroder 10:52, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

EC images

edit]

Hello, thank you for helping clear the backlog for Category:EC-Audiovisual Center review needed. The process needs a slight adjustment though.

The {{EC-Audiovisual Center}} template itself is a license template, so the reviewed information should go in that template and not in a newly added {{LicenseReview}} tag. For example, from this edit we now have two license tags on the file; one unreviewed and the other reviewed. And unfortunately even though you reviewed a bunch of EC-Audiovisual files, the files still show in the Category:EC-Audiovisual Center review needed category.

Please let me know if I can help. Best regards, // sikander { talk } 🦖 13:31, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

• Thank you, noted. Юрий Д.К 19:32, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Большой театр, вид с Театрального проезда.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:58, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Лобное место на фоне храма Василия Блаженного.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:59, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Общий вид ул. Охотный ряд, Москва.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, but the fragment of lamp post up right is disturbing a bit, can you remove it, please? --Екатерина Борисова 03:01, 27 May 2024 (UTC). I will try to fix this. Thank. Юрий Д.К. 20:07, 28 May 2024 (UTC) @Екатерина Борисова: , fixed. Юрий Д.К. 19:46, 29 May 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. Thanks! (обращайте внимание, пожалуйста, не торчат ли у вас такие вот ветки или куски чего-то по краям - вроде мелочь, а портит хороший кадр) --Екатерина Борисова 00:23, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

Duplicates

edit]

I just noticed that all the files in the series of File:Trip to Australia 2009 you uploaded in July 2023 are actually lower resolution duplicates of the same files Fæ already uploaded in 2016. See File:Trip to Australia 2009 56.jpg and File:In Kakadu Natl Park E of Darwin N.T - a roadside forest fire reddens the imminent sunset (13113319793).jpg as an example. I tagged a few but I'm not going to do all for you. As per COM:Dupe, the duplicates should be deleted. I leave it up to you as the uploader to sort this out. Calistemon (talk) 01:00, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

• @Calistemon: It seems that Flickr author uploaded these files to Flickr, later deleted (by the time they have been uploaded to Commons). After deletion, he edited the files and re-uploaded them. So it is almost impossible to detect duplicates by time of the upload (July 2023) because they are only visually duplicates, not technically. Thank you for note, I will try to find all duplicates and tag it. Юрий Д.К 07:31, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

I noticed that the image sizes are vastly different and wondered what the reason for that was. By the looks of Category:Photographs by Murray Foubister, there is a vast number of images from this Flickr author but, I think, there is only about 50 or so in the Trip to Australia 2009 group. Calistemon (talk) 07:40, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

IP masking scandal

edit]

(Edit conflict) Hi. Would you like to copy the following back to Talk:Trust and Safety Product/Temporary Accounts#Without theme on MediaWiki as there is a massive cover-up going on?

Let's kill this canard that it is legally impossible to edit using IP addresses stone dead. It is claimed that there is "risk to users whose information is published in this way." That's like claiming that it is legally impossible for a stuntman to perform a stunt because of the risk to him personally. But he assumes the risk - to prevent him earning his living in a way he enjoys is to breach his human rights. You might as well ban boxing, cricket, football, golf, horseracing, motor racing and rugby, all of which have seen fatalities. This is why, if this ill-informed scheme ever comes to fruition, it will be challenged in the European Court on day one. It's cleverly constructed to breach consumers' human rights - there will be a little notice saying a temporary account will be created. It does not say that it will link together all the IP addresses used by the editor over the next year, which will typically run into the hundreds. Just look at the information provided when you click "account details" on your email account. That information is accessible only to you, but you have no control over who is getting the information stored in the cookie - Wikimedia couldn't tell you anyway, because they don't know! The Court has ruled the user must be given the opportunity to make "a clear and informed choice" about whether she wants a cookie or not - i.e. "yes" or "no". A dialogue box must be presented explaining EXACTLY what this cookie will do and EXACTLY WHO will be able to access the information. The user must be given the choice between accepting this privacy-invading scheme or using her IP, which will not be linked to any other IP the editor may use. 5.150.116.154 10:03, 11 May 2024 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.5.88.70 (talk) 07:36, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

Hi. The reply has been reverted by another user so I don't want to come back it. If the IP wants to continue discussing he/she may itself re-add them. Thank for your note. Юрий Д.К 08:00, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Жилые дома на ул. Сосенский Стан, Москва.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Skander zarrad 22:16, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Фасад Малого театра, вид с Театрального проезда.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 10:44, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Общий вид ул. Тверская, Москва.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 10:44, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Фасад ГИМ с Манежной площади.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Skander zarrad 13:56, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Общий вид на Манежную площадь с Кремлёвского проезда.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 10:44, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Общий вид ул. Карасева в Москве.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 16:09, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Общий вид жилого комплекса на ул. Карасева в Москве.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 16:09, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Проектируемый проезд 7046 - Сосенское, Москва.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 16:09, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Кряквы - Ивановский пруд, Сосенское, Москва.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 19:07, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 06:03, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Жилые дома, ЖК Москвичка.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:30, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Вид на Средние торговые ряды с Красной площади.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Not quite centered, but a good image --Acroterion 02:09, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Автомобили Первого канала.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:41, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Общий вид Театральной площади с Театрального проезда.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:18, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Манежная площадь и Центральный выставочный зал.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 18:52, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ГУМ (левая часть здания).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Left and right sides not vertical --Mike1979 Russia 07:20, 7 June 2024 (UTC) Corrected Юрий Д.К. 19:08, 7 June 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 07:06, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Манежная площадь, Москва.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:07, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Вид на Храм Василия Блаженного и памятник Минину и Пожарскому.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Lacks details in the shadows (under the legs of the statue) : is it possible to get those details back ? --Benjism89 17:46, 3 June 2024 (UTC) @Benjism89: Hi. Unfortunately, no. It seems that the cloud obscured the sun a bit when I took the photo and due to this, some small details disappeared. Ok to me. I don'tsee any issue with details in the shadow. A shadow is a shadow. And here it represents 1 % of the image area. --Sebring12Hrs 22:01, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Вид на памятник Минину и Пожарскому и Храм Василия Блаженного.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 04:37, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Неоконченное здание, ЖК Эко Бунино.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Вид Four Seasons Hotel с Охотного ряда.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:03, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Общий вид на Мавзолей Ленина и Спасскую башню.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:41, 14 June 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Anidae 16:07, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Вид на памятник Минину и Пожарскому и Храм Василия Блаженного.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 04:37, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Metropol (Moscow) - 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Skander zarrad 22:06, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ivan Vitali Fountain - 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 22:41, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Театральная площадь, недалеко от Метрополя.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --El Golli Mohamed 21:03, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ефремов, ул. Орловская 2024-3 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:12, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

File:20190812 15 Mural near Huron & Adams Sts., Toledo, Ohio - 49876443931.jpg

File:20190812 15 Mural near Huron & Adams Sts., Toledo, Ohio - 49876443931.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 04:41, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Набатная башня, Красная площадь.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --El Golli Mohamed 15:03, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Фасад ГУМа, вид со стороны ГИМ.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --El Golli Mohamed 15:04, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Детали фасада Большого театра.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 13:40, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ремонтно-восстановительные работы ГУМ в апреле 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Moroder 14:45, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ул. Большая Дмитровка, Москва.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments right not vertical --Mike1979 Russia 07:22, 7 June 2024 (UTC) Corrected Юрий Д.К. 19:08, 7 June 2024 (UTC) right side still not vertical --Mike1979 Russia 07:07, 8 June 2024 (UTC) @Mike1979 Russia: Посмотрите пожалуйста снова, вроде теперь порядок. Если нет, то наверно проще сделать новое фото. Юрий Д.К. 21:08, 15 June 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 05:56, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

Don't cancel my vote please

edit]

Don't cancel my vote --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 21:42, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

• @Sebring12Hrs: Hi! Sorry. It has been edit conflict and my votes also lost. I had to vote again and in parts (by 2 and 3). I didn't cancel your votes manually Юрий Д.К 21:43, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

  No problem. Have a nice day. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 21:46, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Здание Кремлёвской больницы с поликлиникой, вид со стороны библиотеки им. Ленина.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality & composition --Екатерина Борисова 01:56, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Общий вид на ул. Тверская, Москва.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 22:10, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Общий вид Манежной площади с ул. Тверская, Москва.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 22:10, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ivan Vitali Fountain 2024 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit dark in the shadows. Otherwise good --MB-one 08:59, 17 June 2024 (UTC) @MB-one: New version uploaded, thank you Юрий Д.К. 15:52, 18 June 2024 (UTC)  Support Much better --MB-one 16:29, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Улица Зои и Александра Космодемьянских, Москва.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:40, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Детская площадка в одном из дворов на Проспекте Куприна, Москва.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Skander zarrad 20:58, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Станция метро Охотный ряд, вид с Театрального проезда, Москва.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 22:03, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Заброшенный гараж на ул. Московская Застава - Ефремов.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good image. But please give a geocode or a more precise location. --Augustgeyler 16:42, 17 June 2024 (UTC) @Augustgeyler: Done Юрий Д.К. 19:02, 17 June 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 19:36, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ул. Московская Застава - Ефремов2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Ok. --Sebring12Hrs 21:48, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Общий вид Манежной площади, гостиницы Националь и дома Жолтовского.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 13:07, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Деревня Ямонтово, Москва.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Is it possible to do some color & brightness correction? It's nice landscape but looks quite gloomy now. (Небо в частности какое-то ненатурально серо-буроватое, будто смотришь сквозь мутное стекло). --Екатерина Борисова 02:16, 20 June 2024 (UTC) Загрузил новую версию, спасибо. Юрий Д.К. 16:17, 21 June 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality (совсем другое дело!) --Екатерина Борисова 18:02, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Жилое здание 1959 года на ул. Большая Академическая, Москва.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Moroder 17:41, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Поселение Воскресенское, вид с Проектируемого проезда 7032.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment A bit tilted at left, otherwise good. --Sebring12Hrs 13:04, 20 June 2024 (UTC) I've made some fixes Юрий Д.К. 16:17, 21 June 2024 (UTC) Also I'd suggest to improve the white balance (здесь бы тоже подправить, как Ямонтово) --Екатерина Борисова 22:22, 21 June 2024 (UTC) I've uploaded new version with realistic colors. Thank. Юрий Д.К. 16:57, 22 June 2024 (UTC)  Support Thanks, looks better now --Екатерина Борисова 23:00, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Газораспределительная подстанция около ул. Проектируемый проезд 7032, Москва (cropped).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs a tighter crop. Otherwise good --MB-one 13:20, 21 June 2024 (UTC) @MB-one: Thanks, new version uploaded Юрий Д.К. 16:47, 22 June 2024 (UTC)  Support Would have preferred even tighter. But good enough --MB-one 09:45, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:48, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Вид на Проектируемый проезд 7032, Москва.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment I am not sure about the white balance here. Was it such a warm light at noon there? Did you see it like it es represented now? Otherwise good image. I'd suggest adding a geolocation. --Augustgeyler 13:37, 21 June 2024 (UTC) @Augustgeyler: Right, WB is wrong. But it has looked ok for me and I've decided not to fix this. New file uploaded with realistic colors and coords. Thanks Юрий Д.К. 16:47, 22 June 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality.  Thank you. --Augustgeyler 17:15, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Общий вид с Васильевского спуска на Большой Москворецкий мост, Москва.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Technically ok but IMO not a good composition. --Plozessor 04:03, 4 July 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Marwenwafi 04:25, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Вид с Васильевского спуска на Большой Москворецкий мост, Москва.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:03, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Общий вид с Васильевского спуска, Москва.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Marwenwafi 04:25, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Барельеф памятника Минину и Пожарскому, Москва.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ReneeWrites 22:08, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

File:LeningradMay 9 1977 (10808918406).jpg

File:LeningradMay 9 1977 (10808918406).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 02:44, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Вид на 5-й Новоподмосковный переулок с ул. Зои и Александра Космодемьянских, Москва.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perspective correction needed (надо повернуть фото так, чтобы разметка на асфальте была параллельна нижнему краю снимка) --Екатерина Борисова 02:49, 4 July 2024 (UTC) @Екатерина Борисова: Здравствуйте. Попробовал исправить. Юрий Д.К. 20:33, 5 July 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality, thanks. ("кирпич" немного заваливается вправо, но мне кажется, что это не критично) --Екатерина Борисова 22:06, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 8 July 2024 (UTC)