Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hohenschwangau - Schloss Neuschwanstein1.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2011 at 14:22:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info all by Wladyslaw -- Wladyslaw (talk) 14:22, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
- Support -- Wladyslaw (talk) 14:22, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
- Support Tomer T (talk) 15:37, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
- Support --Karelj (talk) 18:48, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
- Support Very nice. Steven Walling 19:45, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
- Support --Lošmi (talk) 20:11, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose This is a standard shot we have a dozen of, and another version from a slightly better angle and less flat light has been already featured . --ELEKHHT 00:08, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
- I disagree, I find this angle more impressive. -- One, please. ( Thank you.) 04:33, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
- Support It's interesting to have a candidate so directly comparable to an existing FP. I picked through both versions, here are my inclinations:
- The two pics have very similar resolution, disappointingly small given that this is such a standard shot, why not use the whole sensor / not downsample?
- Both have similar sharpness.
- The angles are so very similar that I can't say which I think is better.
- This one has better lighting IMO, although it is more "flat", it shows better detail on the wall facing left. I find the shadows too strong in the other version.
- This one has less pine trees obscuring the castle. Amazing that they've cut so many down, presumably for this reason?
- So, this one has my support, and if it gets up, I think the other should be delisted. --99of9 (talk) 04:47, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
- Support Now we have an FP more by this motif. --Ritchyblack (talk) 07:38, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
- Support per 99of9's arguments, but I don't think that the other should be delisted. Irgendwann muss ich auch unbedingt mal zu diesem Schloss hoch... --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 08:09, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
- Support I prefer this version, I don't like the shadows in the other FP, perhaps we can delist and replace the old one. ■ MMXX talk 10:23, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
- Support I agree with 99of9. --Phyrexian ɸ 18:26, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
- Support toll --Böhringer (talk) 22:27, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
- Support Good --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:16, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
- Support —stay (sic)! 05:41, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
- Support --Citron (talk) 12:06, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
- Support Gamaliel (talk) 22:29, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
- Support Galandil (talk) 08:21, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
- Support • Richard • [®] • 21:40, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 17 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 20:30, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture