Jump to content

Talk:Reading/Web/Desktop Improvements

Add topic
From mediawiki.org
Latest comment: 6 days ago by Superyetkin in topic User icons


retest content separation wen

[edit]

@SGrabarczuk (WMF) In the last update, you mention As we reported previously, the A/B test didn't prove that the color-based separation was an improvement.. However, that's not what the previous update really concludes. The previous update concluded that the prototype was flawed for small screen sizes and recommended Introducing improvements to Zebra, optimizing for narrower screens, and repeating the tests.. Aaron Liu (talk) 14:03, 2 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hey @Aaron Liu - thanks for the question! So we tested this idea in two contexts. The first was the prototype testing in a user testing context (testing with a small group of readers who give us feedback). The results of this test are available on this page. Here we found that, while there wasn't a noticeable different in readability that we could measure between the two versions, users did say they have a slight personal preference towards the newer version. Based on this, we decided to proceed testing this version on a larger scale. The second test, which was the A/B test on the feature is the one that showed us issues that showed us that, were we to proceed with this, we would need to go back to the drawing board. While this is still a possibility for the future, we haven't prioritized it yet as, based on the user testing, we don't have a strong proof that it would be significantly helpful to readers and editors. OVasileva (WMF) (talk) 09:04, 23 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hey @OVasileva (WMF), the A/B test on the feature seems to be the same one reported in the previous update. See my last sentence. Aaron Liu (talk) 14:38, 23 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Bumping this to avoid archiving before resolution. Aaron Liu (talk) 11:51, 5 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Infobox section display error on mobile

[edit]
Infobox display error on Mobile

This error appears on infoboxes on the mobile web version of Wikipedia, where double lines appears below section headings (such as Government, Formation, etc. as shown below) and single lines appear seperating every single line. This error appears on the mobile as well as the desktop layouts in the mobile version of Wikipedia (one where the links start with en.m.wiki [...]), but does not appear on the desktop web version (en.wikipe [...]). I'm not sure if this is the correct spot to report this error, and I'd be glad if someone could tell me what to do in this situation. PadFoot2008 (talk) 08:09, 27 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

This is an error in the template generating the infobox, where the infobox is emitting an empty row. That causes problems like this. P.S. Next time, please link to pages where you see a problem, so that we don't have to type over the content of a screenshot into a google search, in order to find the article. —TheDJ (Not WMF) (talkcontribs) 10:21, 4 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Inappropriate images shown in search results

[edit]

When I look for w:Scroll on enwiki in vec2022 (i made the switch a few days ago), the infobox image for w:Scrotum shows in the tentative search results as I type. While I get that Wikipedia is not censored, I do find it a bit odd that we show inappropriate images to users who have expressed absolutely no interest in seeing them. Like, if I actually navigated to the latter page, that's on me, but users should have the ability to choose their UX and this is not that. Theleekycauldron (talk) 06:56, 6 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Visibility of Wikipedia search field

[edit]

Following content copied from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals), as advised.

Invariably the first thing I want to do after landing at the Wikipedia home page is search for the article that I want to look at. I think it would be sensible to make the search field permanently visible. There is already room there at the top of the page, and although only a click away, it seems unnecessary to have to click on the magnifier. Why not just have the field there ready to type into? Am I right in thinking that it used to be that way? I wonder why it was changed. 2A00:23C8:7B0C:9A01:8A7:5D88:5F57:107E (talk) 19:53, 8 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

I think the magnifying glass only appears when the window is narrower than some threshold (looks like about 1100 px). I'm not sure why they do that; there's plenty of space left at all but the most extremely narrow widths to allow for a full search box. But in any case, this is really a Vector 2022 skin issue, not something enwiki has any direct control over. Perhaps ask on meta:Talk:Reading/Web/Desktop Improvements? RoySmith (talk) 20:04, 8 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
You're right, it's dynamically controlled. I didn't realise that. When I lower the browser zoom level the search field becomes visible. It seems to me that all that needs to be done is adjust the "trigger" level at which it is displayed, so it is only suppressed when there is "obviously" not enough room to type a search query. 2A00:23C8:7B0C:9A01:8A7:5D88:5F57:107E (talk) 20:32, 8 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Yes, but to repeat what I said earlier, this is not anything that is under the control of enwiki. This is a feature of the Vector 2022 skin, which is under the control of the Wikimedia Foundation web team and best discussed at meta:Talk:Reading/Web/Desktop Improvements. RoySmith (talk) 20:50, 8 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Page does not exist / link does not work, though actually I see now that there is another link there pointing to the correct page. 2A00:23C8:7B0C:9A01:8A7:5D88:5F57:107E (talk) 21:03, 8 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
We've been getting an influx of questions over this at places like the English Wikipedia's help desk and Teahouse. Was there a recent skin update, WMF staff? I suppose my real question here is:
Is there a link to a changelog? Tenryuu (talk) 15:39, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

User icons

[edit]

User icons do not show up at top right of the page. Please look here --Superyetkin (talk) 16:42, 13 September 2024 (UTC)Reply