- From: Guillaume via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2023 06:04:32 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
cdoublev has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [css-values-4][css-variables] Parsing priority between substitution values == Does parsing arbitrary substitution values (`var()`, `attr()`, `random-item()`) has priority over parsing other substitution values (`mix()` and `toggle()`)? For example, is `animation-duration: mix(50%; invalid; var(--end)) extra` valid? > A `mix()` notation is invalid if it is not the sole value of the property; if either of its `<declaration-value>`s are invalid when specified as the entire value for the property the function is used in; or if the property using it is not animatable. https://w3c.github.io/csswg-drafts/css-values-4/#interpolate > If a property contains one or more `var()` functions, and those functions are syntactically valid, the entire property’s grammar must be assumed to be valid at parse time. https://w3c.github.io/csswg-drafts/css-variables-2/#using-variables Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8731 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 19 April 2023 06:04:33 UTC