Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jargon compliance

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 06:11, 21 August 2005 (UTC)

Jargon compliance

Wired magazine neologism without encyclopedic potential. Www.wikinerds.org 09:53, 15 August 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, If it was created in the 1990's is not really a neologism, but is a 'logism of some sort. It gets about 75 Googles, so can be ditched as a made-up phrase that didn't catch on. -Splash 19:11, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. If not neologism, then hopelessly obscure. ManoaChild 21:30, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - my Latin's not good enough to figure out the type of 'logism :) -Satori 21:02, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
  • What about cacologism? Although itself a neologism (invented by me right now), I think it's great. (note that it's derived from Greek and not Latin) Punkmorten 20:24, 17 August 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.