Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bresketball: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Ravenswing (talk | contribs) |
→Bresketball: -pile on delete |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
*Anyone who wants to delete this via [[WP:SNOW]] should feel free. [[User:Hobit|Hobit]] ([[User talk:Hobit|talk]]) 15:44, 28 September 2011 (UTC) |
*Anyone who wants to delete this via [[WP:SNOW]] should feel free. [[User:Hobit|Hobit]] ([[User talk:Hobit|talk]]) 15:44, 28 September 2011 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete with fire and storm:''' Aside from the other failed criteria cited above, this butts heads with [[WP:BULLSHIT]]. [[User:Ravenswing|'''<span style="background:Blue;color:Cyan"> Ravenswing </span>''']] 16:13, 28 September 2011 (UTC) |
*'''Delete with fire and storm:''' Aside from the other failed criteria cited above, this butts heads with [[WP:BULLSHIT]]. [[User:Ravenswing|'''<span style="background:Blue;color:Cyan"> Ravenswing </span>''']] 16:13, 28 September 2011 (UTC) |
||
*'''Speedy delete''' per [[WP:SNOW]] [[User:Puchiko|Puchiko]] ([[User Talk:Puchiko|Talk]]-[[Special:Emailuser/Puchiko|email]]) 19:32, 28 September 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:32, 28 September 2011
- Bresketball (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested prod. Violation of WP:MADEUP, Youtube as the only source, thereby merely attesting nothing but existence. Delete. Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 23:52, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - per nom. This is just foolishness. -- WikHead (talk) 00:00, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:58, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete as G1 - Even humoring this with an AfD is beyond ridiculous. Trusilver 01:19, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
- Certainly not a G1. Patent nonsense doesn't include coherent text. Hobit (talk) 12:36, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. As a neologism, or, if you want to bend over backwards to be generous, on the grounds that WP is not a dictionary.--amongst the small number of cruddy, juvenile Google hits, there is an Urban Dictionary entry, for what that's worth. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 01:35, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
- Comment: Urban Dictionary? Worth squat. Ravenswing 16:14, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
- Delete exists and term is used, but nothing even close to a RS. Hobit (talk) 12:35, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
- Speedy delete, per G1. 11coolguy12 (talk) 14:38, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as hoax. I don't even see a reference (currently).Curb Chain (talk) 15:09, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
- Arg. A google search shows this exists. Not even vaguely notable, but exists and so not a hoax. Hobit (talk) 15:43, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
- Anyone who wants to delete this via WP:SNOW should feel free. Hobit (talk) 15:44, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
- Delete with fire and storm: Aside from the other failed criteria cited above, this butts heads with WP:BULLSHIT. Ravenswing 16:13, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per WP:SNOW Puchiko (Talk-email) 19:32, 28 September 2011 (UTC)