User talk:Cyde: Difference between revisions
Ottawahitech (talk | contribs) →Edit summaries left by Cydebot are insufficient: new section |
|||
| Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
The Edit summaries left by Cydebot are insufficient. For example: on |
The Edit summaries left by Cydebot are insufficient. For example: on |
||
02:56, 27 May 2013 in [[:Category:Swiss women writers]] I see in the Revision history that Cydebot left a Edit summary saying {{Green|Robot - Result of CFD discussion was Keep; removing CFD template(s).}} However there is no wiki-link to the discussion itself. How can interested editors find the discussion whch resulted in the ‘’’Keep’’’ vote? [[User:Ottawahitech|Ottawahitech]] ([[User talk:Ottawahitech|talk]]) 10:14, 16 October 2015 (UTC) {{small|please ping me}} |
02:56, 27 May 2013 in [[:Category:Swiss women writers]] I see in the Revision history that Cydebot left a Edit summary saying {{Green|Robot - Result of CFD discussion was Keep; removing CFD template(s).}} However there is no wiki-link to the discussion itself. How can interested editors find the discussion whch resulted in the ‘’’Keep’’’ vote? [[User:Ottawahitech|Ottawahitech]] ([[User talk:Ottawahitech|talk]]) 10:14, 16 October 2015 (UTC) {{small|please ping me}} |
||
:I don't know maybe looking on the talk page where the link to the discussion ALWAYS is? Or is that too complicated for you? |
|||
Revision as of 12:50, 16 October 2015
Cyde's talk page Leave a new message
Archives
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
10
11
12
Cydebot bugs
Hi, thanks again for your prompt attention, updating Cydebot again and again after all the changes in the framework.
When you have time, please look into these:
- Regularly removing only one line from a Speedy CFD template [1]
- or occasionally blanking the category page instead of just removing the Speedy template [2] [3] [4] [5]
- Occasionally blanking a category page instead of just removing a full CFD template [6] [7] [8] [9]
– Fayenatic London 13:26, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, I noticed that, too. Only removing part of the Cfd markup from a moved category page. And Good Olfactory tells me he's seen this problem "on quite a few new categories created via speedy" rename. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 11:18, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 September 2015
- Recent research: Wiktionary special; newbies, conflict and tolerance; Is Wikipedia's search function inferior?
- Tech news: Tech news in brief
Speedy deletions
Your bot for listing speedy deletions has stopped working. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 03:05, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 07 October 2015
- Op-ed: Walled gardens of corruption
- Traffic report: Reality is for losers
- Featured content: This Week's Featured Content
- Arbitration report: Warning: Contains GMOs
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
Edit summaries left by Cydebot are insufficient
The Edit summaries left by Cydebot are insufficient. For example: on 02:56, 27 May 2013 in Category:Swiss women writers I see in the Revision history that Cydebot left a Edit summary saying Robot - Result of CFD discussion was Keep; removing CFD template(s). However there is no wiki-link to the discussion itself. How can interested editors find the discussion whch resulted in the ‘’’Keep’’’ vote? Ottawahitech (talk) 10:14, 16 October 2015 (UTC) please ping me
- I don't know maybe looking on the talk page where the link to the discussion ALWAYS is? Or is that too complicated for you?