Jump to content

User talk:Braganza: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:Braganza/Archive 3) (bot
 
(24 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| algo = old(30d)
| algo = old(30d)
| archive = User talk:Braganza/Archive %(counter)d
| archive = User talk:Braganza/Archive %(counter)d
| counter = 2
| counter = 3
| maxarchivesize = 150K
| maxarchivesize = 150K
| archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}}
| archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}}
Line 8: Line 8:
| minthreadsleft = 2
| minthreadsleft = 2
}}
}}
==Explanation for dubious tag on [[European political party]]==
==Disambiguation link notification for February 14 ==
Ciao Braganza,


Thanks for your contribution to [[European political party]]. I see that you added a "dubious - discuss" tag for the classification of the [[Alliance of European National Movements]] as "Right-wing populist". Could you kindly explain what led you to add this tag?
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited [[2024 Italian regional elections]], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page [[IND]].


The ideology listed in the table is the one from the [[Alliance of European National Movements|AENM]]'s own page, and this is very much supported not only by the AENM's own ideology but also by that of pretty much all its (former) national member parties.
([[User:DPL bot|Opt-out instructions]].) --[[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 18:04, 14 February 2024 (UTC)


Thank you for this information.
==Disambiguation link notification for February 21 ==


[[User:Julius Schwarz|Julius Schwarz]] ([[User talk:Julius Schwarz|talk]]) 07:03, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited [[1929 Czechoslovak parliamentary election]], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page [[Rusyn]].


:true {{ping|Julius Schwarz}} but its more secondary
([[User:DPL bot|Opt-out instructions]].) --[[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 18:03, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
:Fiamma Tricolore, MSR, CasaPound & old Jobbik are too radical for this label so i wouldn't include it in an article like European political party [[User:Braganza|Braganza]] ([[User talk:Braganza#top|talk]]) 07:14, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
::I see. The thing with European political parties is that their positioning is a combination of the positioning of their members, meaning you will always have some members that are more to the left or to the right, more moderate or more radical, more pro/anti-EU or less pro/anti-EU. I think in the case of the AENM, the qualifier is justified, as it reflects the position of many (former) national member parties as well as that of the (former) European party itself. This is not to say, of course, that this qualifier applies equally and as much to all national member parties. [[User:Julius Schwarz|Julius Schwarz]] ([[User talk:Julius Schwarz|talk]]) 07:20, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
:::then remove it [[User:Braganza|Braganza]] ([[User talk:Braganza#top|talk]]) 07:22, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
::::Fair enough. [[User:Julius Schwarz|Julius Schwarz]] ([[User talk:Julius Schwarz|talk]]) 07:22, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
:::::i mean my complain [[User:Braganza|Braganza]] ([[User talk:Braganza#top|talk]]) 07:28, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
::::::You mean the dubious tag, right? If so, I have just removed it. [[User:Julius Schwarz|Julius Schwarz]] ([[User talk:Julius Schwarz|talk]]) 07:33, 9 May 2024 (UTC)


==ELAM (Cyprus)==
== Invitation to join New pages patrol ==
Hi {{U|Braganza}}. As you added neo-fascism to the page, [[ELAM (Cyprus)]], I thought you should be made aware that an editor has been disputing this and trying to remove this information. You may want to explain why you added it to them on the article's talk page. [[User:Helper201|Helper201]] ([[User talk:Helper201|talk]]) 18:28, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

<div style="border:2px solid #90C0FF; background:#F0F0FF; width:99%; padding:4px">
[[File:Wikipedia New page reviewer.svg|right|175px]]
Hello Braganza!
* The [[WP:NPP|New Pages Patrol]] is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
* We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the [[Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Reviewers#Guidelines for granting|guidelines for granting]].
* Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
* Kindly read [[WP:NPP|the tutorial]] before making your decision, and feel free to post on the [[WT:NPPR|project talk page]] with questions.
* If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider [[Wikipedia:PERM/NPP|'''applying here''']].
Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!
</div>
[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 15:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:EN-Jungwon@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/Coordination/Invite_list_3&oldid=1209520564 -->

== National affiliation of Italia in Comune ==

Do you have any sources for [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Italia_in_Comune&diff=1210366087&oldid=1173631356 this edit] in [[Italia in Comune]]? I'm not aware of any link between Azione and IIC. [[User:SilverShadow2|SilverShadow2]] ([[User talk:SilverShadow2|talk]]) 17:37, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

:it was twitter actually, ultimora irrc [[User:Braganza|Braganza]] ([[User talk:Braganza#top|talk]]) 17:52, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
::{{ping|SilverShadow2}} [https://twitter.com/rivamatteoriva/status/1761798533861048690] it was a claim by +E even [[User:Braganza|Braganza]] ([[User talk:Braganza#top|talk]]) 09:55, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
:::[https://x.com/FedePizzarotti/status/1761826695659594097?s=20] On that same tweet, Pizzarotti himself denied the news. At the moment, both Pizzarotti and Falasca are still member of +E: if and when they'll leave to join Action, we'll update their pages. Moreover I think it's not correct to link IIC with what Pizzarotti and Falasca do: for example, Alessio Pascucci joined Greens and Left list at [[2023 Lazio regional election]]. IIC is at the moment inactive, and what their former members do now is not something relevant for the party itself. [[User:SilverShadow2|SilverShadow2]] ([[User talk:SilverShadow2|talk]]) 11:02, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

== RFP affiliate in Subcarpathia? ==

Hi Braganza. I noticed you added that the [[Russian National Autonomous Party]] would have been an affiliate of the [[Russian Fascist Party]]. Any reference for this claim? -- [[User:Soman|Soman]] ([[User talk:Soman|talk]]) 23:20, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

:{{ping|Soman}} its a claim brought up by russian wikipedia but looking into it i cant verify, the link for the source given starts with page 194 (104 is used) [[User:Braganza|Braganza]] ([[User talk:Braganza#top|talk]]) 05:59, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

==March 2024==
[[File:Information orange.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against [[Wikipedia:Article titles|naming conventions]] or [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]], as you did to [[:Restart Coalition]]. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains underway. We have some [[Wikipedia:Article titles|guidelines]] to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the [[: testwiki:|test]] Wikipedia. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-move2 --> [[User:Dl2000|Dl2000]] ([[User talk:Dl2000|talk]]) 00:19, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

:{{ping|Dl2000}} the coalition was only called Restart Coalition in the 2020 election [[User:Braganza|Braganza]] ([[User talk:Braganza#top|talk]]) 07:05, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 20:28, 5 June 2024

Explanation for dubious tag on European political party[edit]

Ciao Braganza,

Thanks for your contribution to European political party. I see that you added a "dubious - discuss" tag for the classification of the Alliance of European National Movements as "Right-wing populist". Could you kindly explain what led you to add this tag?

The ideology listed in the table is the one from the AENM's own page, and this is very much supported not only by the AENM's own ideology but also by that of pretty much all its (former) national member parties.

Thank you for this information.

Julius Schwarz (talk) 07:03, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[]

true @Julius Schwarz: but its more secondary
Fiamma Tricolore, MSR, CasaPound & old Jobbik are too radical for this label so i wouldn't include it in an article like European political party Braganza (talk) 07:14, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[]
I see. The thing with European political parties is that their positioning is a combination of the positioning of their members, meaning you will always have some members that are more to the left or to the right, more moderate or more radical, more pro/anti-EU or less pro/anti-EU. I think in the case of the AENM, the qualifier is justified, as it reflects the position of many (former) national member parties as well as that of the (former) European party itself. This is not to say, of course, that this qualifier applies equally and as much to all national member parties. Julius Schwarz (talk) 07:20, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[]
then remove it Braganza (talk) 07:22, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[]
Fair enough. Julius Schwarz (talk) 07:22, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[]
i mean my complain Braganza (talk) 07:28, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[]
You mean the dubious tag, right? If so, I have just removed it. Julius Schwarz (talk) 07:33, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[]

Hi Braganza. As you added neo-fascism to the page, ELAM (Cyprus), I thought you should be made aware that an editor has been disputing this and trying to remove this information. You may want to explain why you added it to them on the article's talk page. Helper201 (talk) 18:28, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[]