User talk:125.239.145.26

April 2014

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your image was inserted successfully on the page Malaysia Airlines Flight 370, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Glenn L (talk) 04:47, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Note: For these reasons your edit was reverted: (1) The use of an adjective to describe nationality, while not universal, is common enough to not require a wholesale change in the chart; and, more importantly (2) Your edit damaged the original chart. You're certainly welcome to correct errors in the article, though if they're not typographical or grammatical errors, you are encouraged to provide source material for the edit(s). Creating an account will help to not get you quickly reverted. Thank you. -- Glenn L (talk) 08:07, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  gadfium 08:46, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

125.239.145.26 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

What is going on? All I wanted to suggest was that the Malaysian flight victims is formatted in the wrong way. And now I am blocked without from editing? 125.239.145.26 (talk) 09:21, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Even just looking at your editing of pickpocketing, constituting repeated vandalism on one article over the course of nearly two and a half months, there is plenty of justification for a mere three-day block. However, that is not all: other edits that you have made are also contentious, and sometimes vandalism. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 10:46, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are blocked for your three edits to pickpocketing which are clear trolling. Your edits to Portal:Current events/2014 April 20 are provocative also.-gadfium 09:34, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

125.239.145.26 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

My edits to Portal:Current events/2014 April 20 are not vandalism. Wikipedia is presenting Jesus' resurrection as fact in the current events section. I thought Wikipedia was supposed to have a NPOV, or does this not apply when you don't want to offend your Christian readers and risk your precious donations that you are always harping on about how much you need??? 125.239.145.26 (talk) 12:35, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=My edits to [[Portal:Current events/2014 April 20]] are not vandalism. Wikipedia is presenting Jesus' resurrection as fact in the current events section. I thought Wikipedia was supposed to have a NPOV, or does this not apply when you don't want to offend your Christian readers and risk your precious donations that you are always harping on about how much you need??? [[Special:Contributions/125.239.145.26|125.239.145.26]] ([[User talk:125.239.145.26#top|talk]]) 12:35, 24 April 2014 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=My edits to [[Portal:Current events/2014 April 20]] are not vandalism. Wikipedia is presenting Jesus' resurrection as fact in the current events section. I thought Wikipedia was supposed to have a NPOV, or does this not apply when you don't want to offend your Christian readers and risk your precious donations that you are always harping on about how much you need??? [[Special:Contributions/125.239.145.26|125.239.145.26]] ([[User talk:125.239.145.26#top|talk]]) 12:35, 24 April 2014 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=My edits to [[Portal:Current events/2014 April 20]] are not vandalism. Wikipedia is presenting Jesus' resurrection as fact in the current events section. I thought Wikipedia was supposed to have a NPOV, or does this not apply when you don't want to offend your Christian readers and risk your precious donations that you are always harping on about how much you need??? [[Special:Contributions/125.239.145.26|125.239.145.26]] ([[User talk:125.239.145.26#top|talk]]) 12:35, 24 April 2014 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

125.239.145.26 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Here is a source to confirm the closure of the Percy Burn Viaduct. http://www.voxy.co.nz/entertainment/last-chance-cross-percy-burn-viaduct/5/150681 Can someone who is not blocked from Wikipedia please add my original 200 and something characters of text to the Percy Burn Viaduct article as the information is quite important to anyone considering walking the track. 125.239.145.26 (talk) 12:43, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Here is a source to confirm the closure of the Percy Burn Viaduct. http://www.voxy.co.nz/entertainment/last-chance-cross-percy-burn-viaduct/5/150681 Can someone who is not blocked from Wikipedia please add my original 200 and something characters of text to the [[Percy Burn Viaduct]] article as the information is quite important to anyone considering walking the track. [[Special:Contributions/125.239.145.26|125.239.145.26]] ([[User talk:125.239.145.26#top|talk]]) 12:43, 24 April 2014 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Here is a source to confirm the closure of the Percy Burn Viaduct. http://www.voxy.co.nz/entertainment/last-chance-cross-percy-burn-viaduct/5/150681 Can someone who is not blocked from Wikipedia please add my original 200 and something characters of text to the [[Percy Burn Viaduct]] article as the information is quite important to anyone considering walking the track. [[Special:Contributions/125.239.145.26|125.239.145.26]] ([[User talk:125.239.145.26#top|talk]]) 12:43, 24 April 2014 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Here is a source to confirm the closure of the Percy Burn Viaduct. http://www.voxy.co.nz/entertainment/last-chance-cross-percy-burn-viaduct/5/150681 Can someone who is not blocked from Wikipedia please add my original 200 and something characters of text to the [[Percy Burn Viaduct]] article as the information is quite important to anyone considering walking the track. [[Special:Contributions/125.239.145.26|125.239.145.26]] ([[User talk:125.239.145.26#top|talk]]) 12:43, 24 April 2014 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Here is an additional source: http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/regional/236997/waitutu-viaducts-to-be-restored 125.239.145.26 (talk) 12:45, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

You have to unban me ASAP on ENGLISH WIKIPEDIA or the knowledge about the goings on in the world WILL NOT BE KNOWN BY ALL. How can we sit around and let our dear readers believe JESUS CAME BACK FROM THE DEAD, isn't WIKIPEDIA supposed to represent REASON AND SCIENCE? And now you decide you are going to ban anyone who tries to improve the site. WHAT IS THE CURRENT WIKIPEDIA AGENDA? Does Wikipedia receive MILLIONS OF DOLLARS of donations from Christian organizations every year in order to secure a WIDELY READ MEDIUM FOR PROPAGANDA under the guise of NEUTRAL POINT OF VIEW? How do you sleep at night knowing you contribute to a corrupt system? Are you aware that JIMMY WALES HAS RECEIVED MILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN BRIBES from the CATHOLIC CHURCH to present Christianity as fact and systematically ignore reason and science in all of the Wikipedia articles. AND HOW DO YOU DEAL WITH IT? By banning any dissenting contributors. HOW MUCH DID THE POPE PAY YOU TO BAN MY IP ADDRESS FOR 72 HOURS? Don't you see this as morally corrupt? Silencing the whistleblowers and truthseekers through bannings? 125.239.145.26 (talk) 13:32, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Response to your ravings

I firmly believe that you are Insanity and should be removed from Wikipedia immediately. You only have to open your eyes to see that Jesus is not dead. You sound like you've been watching too many Richard Dawkins videos on Youtube. I am not aware of the Pope giving any money to Wikipedia however I am aware that many children who were fiddled by him and his cronies grew up to be nutcase Wikipedia editors like yourself and Gadfium. Good riddance! Swollib (talk) 13:47, 24 April 2014 (UTC)