User talk:4.154.3.7

To edit, please log in.

Last edited:
Last edited by:

16:48, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
4.154.3.123 (talk · contribs)

---

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

Ownership

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. However, please know that editors do not own articles and should respect the work of their fellow contributors. If you create or edit an article, know that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. StaticGull  Talk  13:30, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

• Please state that to User:Kww for removing proven statements to pages. I have billboard links backing me up. 4.154.3.7 (talk) 13:36, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Protest block

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

4.154.3.7 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I said over and over that I am not sockpuppet. I do not have anything to do with User:Kww or his issues.

Decline reason:

Per Gwen Gale below--edit warring, and the fact you found this template so fast indicates at the very least you're somebody's sockpuppet. — Blueboy96 15:07, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• I would also like to appeal that User:Kww have his adminstrator skills removed because he has done nothing but revert, block, appealed sockpuppetry cases, and appealed the deletion of pages. [1] 4.154.3.7 (talk) 13:36, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

You were also edit warring. Gwen Gale (talk) 13:39, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Because I provided information with billboard proof and User:Kww keeps removing it for what he believes in. 4.154.3.7 (talk) 13:42, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Given that I didn't leave a block template here, your knowledge of the unblock template is also noted. Gwen Gale (talk) 13:43, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

It showed how to get unblock when your block. A page leads to how to appeal a block. 4.154.3.7 (talk) 13:46, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

This IP has been blocked 3 days for block evasion and edit warring. If you hadn't tried to edit war it's unlikely anyone would have cared (much) about the block evasion through this IP. Gwen Gale (talk) 13:51, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

I did not start the war, User:Kww did. I had to protect what I was saying so what you said had nothing to do with statement. 4.154.3.7 (talk) 13:58, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

The edits of a banned user can be reverted on sight. Gwen Gale (talk) 14:04, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

If anyone cares to give me admin powers, I'll be willing to bet that this IP couldn't convince anyone to revoke them. I simply refer anyone reviewing this protest to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Soccermeko(13th), and, if you want any more information, you can browse through the earlier 12 reports and 4 checkuser cases. I think the best answer is to start blocking ranges.
Kww (talk) 14:00, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

If I'm suppose to care then it's not working. I cannot even edit a page without coming in and messinng everything up. Stop following my edit and of course I found the unblock template fast because when you are blocked, it leads to a page explaining how appeal to the unblock. It prove that I am anybodies sockpuppet, it just proves that you people are obsessed when trying to find someone to block. 4.154.3.123 (talk) 16:46, 24 August 2008 (UTC)