User talk:94.193.23.189: Difference between revisions
Ccrazymann (talk | contribs) |
Warning: Potentially violating the three revert rule on Chris Sarra. (TW) |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px]] This is the '''only warning''' you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalize]] Wikipedia again{{#if:|, as you did to [[:{{{1}}}]]}}, you '''will''' be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]. <!-- Template:uw-vandalism4im --> [[User:Ccrazymann|Ccrazymann]] ([[User talk:Ccrazymann|talk]]) 09:43, 22 January 2010 (UTC) |
[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px]] This is the '''only warning''' you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalize]] Wikipedia again{{#if:|, as you did to [[:{{{1}}}]]}}, you '''will''' be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]. <!-- Template:uw-vandalism4im --> [[User:Ccrazymann|Ccrazymann]] ([[User talk:Ccrazymann|talk]]) 09:43, 22 January 2010 (UTC) |
||
[[File:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] You currently appear to be engaged in an '''[[WP:Edit war|edit war]]'''  according to the reverts you have made on [[:Chris Sarra]]. Note that the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|discuss controversial changes]] to work towards wording and content that gains a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek [[WP:DR|dispute resolution]], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request [[WP:PP|page protection]]. Please stop the disruption, otherwise '''you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing'''. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> —[[User:Ash|Ash]] ([[User talk:Ash|talk]]) 10:40, 22 January 2010 (UTC) |
|||
:''If this is a shared [[IP address]], and you didn't make any [[Wikipedia:vandalism|unconstructive]] edits, consider [[Wikipedia:Why create an account?|creating an account]] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.'' |
Revision as of 10:40, 22 January 2010
January 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Chris Sarra, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.
- Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Chris Sarra was changed by 94.193.23.189 (u) (t) blanking the page on 2010-01-22T09:32:03+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 09:32, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
Warning
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Ccrazymann (talk) 09:41, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
Warning 2
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Ccrazymann (talk) 09:43, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Chris Sarra. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. —Ash (talk) 10:40, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.