Talk:Kaia Gerber

Ethnicity

Correction: Her mom is of English, Irish, Scottish, Northern Irish, Danish, Welsh, French and German descent. Please update. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.251.252.94 (talk) 23:08, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

• KAIA DAY LOVEME17 - LOVE.webm

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:21, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

Pete

when will be the fact, that she is dating Davidson accepted here on wiki??? People magazine is already on her page as a source, so this should be enough:

https://people.com/tv/pete-davidson-and-kaia-gerber-spotted-holding-hands/

I will not put it on her wikipage again, because some users threatened me, that I will be blocked from wiki. Vladulienka0501 (talk) 18:38, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

There is an ongoing discussion at Talk:Pete Davidson#Relationship, to which you have also posted about this source. I suggest that we continue the discussion there, since the material should either go in both articles or neither. However, in summary, I don't think that this source is good enough, because it doesn't explicitly say that they are in a relationship. Wham2001 (talk) 20:00, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

Relationships of Kaia Gerber

In the section dedicated to personal life. Some users insist on writing about short and insignificant relationships of less than 1 year and even less than 4 months, that is a consensus fault in the Wikipedia community, Regarding relationships, it is only appropriate to write regarding public relations of 1 year or more, marriages, legal separations and divorces, or couples who had children together or adopted, open sexual orientations etc. , Kaia Gerber not marry or have children with none, Some users only insist on writing about those friendships and passing relationships in Kaia Gerber's article, for which I deduce that it is an obvious online vandalism and the worst thing is that they use bad sources as references: TMZ, People magazine, Cosmopolitan, US wekly, daily Mirror, E! entertaiment are not reliable sources. Tamaravon89 (talk)

@Tammaravon89: You don't benefit from pinging yourself, and your signature should link to your user page or talk page.

I agree with Tammaravon89 that previous short-term relationships should be excluded from the article. Wikipedia is not a repository for dating gossip, and the relationships are not significant enough that they need to be included in order to understand other aspects of Gerber's life. Personally I would also exclude mention of her current boyfriend following the same reasoning. Best, Wham2001 (talk) 08:24, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

@Wham2001: agree with you Wham2001 , In accordance with Wikipedia's policies on relevant data and due to the consensus in the KaiaGerber TalkPage, the section dedicated to couple relationships has been eliminated, because Wikipedia is not a repository of relationships, it shee has not married or had children with anyone and in the articles of his partners they do not write about Kaia Gerber, so it is deduced sexist attitudes on the part of the wikipedian users, Tamaravon89 (talk)

Video on Vimeo

There is a video on Vimeo [1]. Looks to be CC if anyone can get anything from it. --Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 19:05, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

Infobox image

@Tammaravon89: Please discus the infobox image here. --Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 21:23, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

The infobox or profile photograph in this article is constantly changed, many Wikipedia users believe that a “close-up” of the face or “cropped photo” of a photograph is an improvement, but this is not always the case, the cropped photo that they insist to use is a poor and low resolution photo, it is a disadvantageous photo and does not represent an improvement for the article, it is not about putting the best, but not the worst, I have tried to find better close-up photographs on my own , but it is difficult due to copyright, months ago I was able to upload a better photo by myself, but the original author's description was missing, so Wikipedia removed that good photo, I invite users of this page to look for better photographs To improve this article, as I understand that photographs can be uploaded from FLICKR that have licenses and copyrights, without necessarily being the author of the photo who uploads it, I for My part is trying to contact amateur photographers or professional who have been able to take photographs of this and other public figures and improve the section of photos of this public figure, but for the moment the best option is full-body already photography, not cropped or close- up — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tammaravon89 (talk • contribs) 22:17, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

"models.com" as a spam link and source of bad reputation

Many users have reported the disreputable site "models.com" as a source that is not 100% reliable, they do not upload everything related to the models, and they have errors in the data if it is added that Wikipedia also has a policy of not spam or giving free publicity to certain platforms or problematic social networks such as twitter or Facebook even more in celebrities and public figures such as Kaia Gerber, for this it seems valid to remove the link from the site "models.com" which also works with a Verified account service with users who manage their content and others who do not, in addition to receiving sponsors, which is why it is like social networks, not a prestigious site like “The Fashion Model Directory” u others, I have reviewed the articles by other celebrities and public figures similar to Kaia Gerber such as models Cara Delevinge , Gisele Bündchen and Kendall Jenner and their articles do not have any links to the site “models.com”, so delete the link from the disreputable site models.com from Kaia Gerber's article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tammaravon89 (talk • contribs)

Do you want to discuss at WP:RSN? --Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 17:28, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Pro jobs & Sources on Wikipedia

1. Please remove 'actress' from introduction (in infobox it can stay). There is nothing to write about as for now. If she has second role more than guest then could be added. Music videos, random IG, YT videos & adverts don't count. What IMDb says is not an oracle for Wikipedia.
Also don't make references to IMDb or some random spanish movie databases - no one is doing it for any professional actress or actor. If no one in any serious press is writing nothing about her then it is like that.
2. Don't make (so much!) references to this industry FMD website. This is industry database. If no one in any serious press is writing nothing about her then it is like that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jgwikid (talk • contribs) 17:21, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Photograph

In my opinion the cropped photograph showing just Gerber's face was a big improvement over the current image in the infobox, and I think that we should change back to it. Pinging Emir of Wikipedia and Tammaravon89. Wham2001 (talk) 19:13, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi! I agree with the cropped photograph, and there was little reason to revert the media accompanying the "Career" section as well.--Bettydaisies (talk) 20:13, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Disagree, the "cropped" photo from the Max Mara 2019 show that insist on using is simply a bad photograph and does not represent an improvement to the article, I had already discussed this before.Please look for new and better photos Tammaravon89 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 20:21, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

@Tammaravon89 I don't understand your reasoning as to why it is a "bad" photograph - its not unflattering and has an acceptable composition, and it's much more suitable than having no infobox image at all.--Bettydaisies (talk) 20:27, 17 January 2021 (UTC)