Jump to content

Talk:Rallying: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m edit
Line 51: Line 51:
*::If there are sources for use of ''Rally racing'' from outside of the USA, it would support this proposal, else, I can't help but feel this point is USA vs ROTW for the second time. [[User:Rally Wonk|Rally Wonk]] ([[User talk:Rally Wonk|talk]]) 22:55, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
*::If there are sources for use of ''Rally racing'' from outside of the USA, it would support this proposal, else, I can't help but feel this point is USA vs ROTW for the second time. [[User:Rally Wonk|Rally Wonk]] ([[User talk:Rally Wonk|talk]]) 22:55, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
*:::[[WP:RETAIN]] is very clear on this: ''"With few exceptions (...), there is no valid reason for changing from one acceptable option to another (English variety.)"'' "Rally racing" is synonymous with rallying, and that's the name that was used when the article was created. There is '''no valid reason''' not to use [[Rally racing]] as the article's title. [[User:162 etc.|162 etc.]] ([[User talk:162 etc.|talk]]) 21:17, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
*:::[[WP:RETAIN]] is very clear on this: ''"With few exceptions (...), there is no valid reason for changing from one acceptable option to another (English variety.)"'' "Rally racing" is synonymous with rallying, and that's the name that was used when the article was created. There is '''no valid reason''' not to use [[Rally racing]] as the article's title. [[User:162 etc.|162 etc.]] ([[User talk:162 etc.|talk]]) 21:17, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
*::::A comment on the valid reasons given would be helpful. [[User:Rally Wonk|Rally Wonk]] ([[User talk:Rally Wonk|talk]]) 21:39, 23 June 2024 (UTC)


:*'''Comment''': The proposal does not suggest that [[Rallying]] should be used for anything like a disambiguation. After this move, Rallying would redirect to the new article. As the first eight words of the article are ''"Rallying is a wide-ranging form of motorsport...''; the argument behind the proposal (that 'Rallying is vague'), is rather weak. Isn't it the case that if one wants to find out more about something, maybe they should read the article, not just the title?
:*'''Comment''': The proposal does not suggest that [[Rallying]] should be used for anything like a disambiguation. After this move, Rallying would redirect to the new article. As the first eight words of the article are ''"Rallying is a wide-ranging form of motorsport...''; the argument behind the proposal (that 'Rallying is vague'), is rather weak. Isn't it the case that if one wants to find out more about something, maybe they should read the article, not just the title?

Revision as of 21:39, 23 June 2024

Former good article nomineeRallying was a Sports and recreation good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 7, 2006Good article nomineeNot listed
November 26, 2022Good article nomineeNot listed
Current status: Former good article nominee

Requested move 12 June 2024

RallyingRally (motorsport) – "Rallying" remains vague, as it can apply in literally every other type of sport "rally" is a term as well as the stock market. It is not an adequate disambiguation. Britannica calls it "rally" [1] so that's what I went with here. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 10:13, 12 June 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 21:12, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[]

Oppose - Britannica does not care for sources or usage, or factual accuracies: for one, rallying by definition of any motorsport governing body is explicitly not racing like they say.
Your point sounds like it mixes Wikipedia articles for Wiktionary entries IMO. I never hear in other sports, or anybody at a political campaign rally that people are rallying to necessitate a move. There's nothing at Rally to suggest it needs to. Sure, a stock can be rallying, but is there ever likely to be an article for that?
Lastly, Rally (motorsport) sounds like a noun, an event, not the wider sport/discipline of rallying. Rally Wonk (talk) 16:41, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[]
  • Comment: The proposal does not suggest that Rallying should be used for anything like a disambiguation. After this move, Rallying would redirect to the new article. As the first eight words of the article are "Rallying is a wide-ranging form of motorsport...; the argument behind the proposal (that 'Rallying is vague'), is rather weak. Isn't it the case that if one wants to find out more about something, maybe they should read the article, not just the title?
Rally Wonk (talk) 23:08, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[]