Jump to content

Search results

Results 1 – 100 of 372
Advanced search

Search in namespaces:

View (previous 100 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
  • Welcome to the Wikipedia deletion process. This page is here to help familiarize you with some of the guidelines and policies relevant to deletion, and the...
    12 KB (1,499 words) - 21:26, 16 June 2024
  • been made, please document the decision using the procedures at Wikipedia:Deletion process. Whether consensus has been achieved by determining a "rough consensus"...
    13 KB (1,833 words) - 01:26, 25 January 2024
  • article to a deletion discussion. If the subject of an article has been proven to pass notability guidelines, there is no need for a deletion discussion...
    3 KB (449 words) - 09:48, 9 January 2024
  • circumstances; closures that non-admins may make are detailed at Wikipedia:Deletion process#Non-administrators closing discussions. For how to perform this...
    38 KB (4,354 words) - 19:51, 25 June 2024
  • previously been subject to proposed deletion (PROD). See Wikipedia:Deletion process § No quorum for full details. Guide to deletion How to delete a page Why was...
    32 KB (3,944 words) - 20:53, 27 June 2024
  • from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Old. See Wikipedia:Deletion process for the preferred process for storing deletion discussions. If you find any...
    54 KB (7,480 words) - 14:50, 29 June 2024
  • Wikipedia:Deletion process#Non-administrators closing discussions XFDcloser – A commonly used tool to help quickly and conveniently close deletion discussions...
    10 KB (1,339 words) - 15:25, 21 May 2024
  • and Wikipedia:Deletion process After seven days, links to discussions are automatically moved from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion#Current discussions to...
    51 KB (6,830 words) - 14:06, 18 June 2024
  • guidelines: Wikipedia:Deletion policy – our deletion policy that describes how we delete things by consensus Wikipedia:Deletion process – our guidelines on...
    2 KB (6,787 words) - 06:02, 1 July 2024
  • June 2024 (UTC) It is timely now to highlight this section from Wikipedia:Deletion_process "Also remember that nobody is obligated to close a discussion...
    949 bytes (6,027 words) - 12:13, 30 June 2024
  • When Deletion is not the answer Deletion policies (EVERYONE should be familiar with this) Wikipedia:Deletion process Wikipedia:Guide to deletion Wikipedia:Archived...
    16 KB (1,634 words) - 07:57, 28 June 2024
  • note that this close may be very slightly out of process, as Wikipedia:Deletion process does not explicitly state that a non-admin may close a nomination...
    3 KB (310 words) - 14:27, 2 February 2022
  • talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Speedy keep – Wikipedia:Deletion_process#Procedural_closure...
    6 KB (609 words) - 21:22, 28 February 2023
  • or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result of the discussion was: redirect to Wikipedia:Deletion process. Salvio...
    3 KB (298 words) - 11:08, 6 September 2020
  • a non admin in good standing could have closed this one, see Wikipedia:Deletion_process#Non-Administrators_closing_discussions. In general it's a bad...
    3 KB (402 words) - 08:03, 29 March 2022
  • In my experience, the threat of deletion often results in some amount of cleanup being done to the article. For example, my AfD nomination for List of...
    5 KB (633 words) - 18:17, 2 August 2023
  • page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was no consensus. Per Wikipedia:Deletion process#No quorum Ryan...
    7 KB (599 words) - 02:20, 5 June 2022
  • page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was no consensus. Per Wikipedia:Deletion process#No quorum Ryan...
    4 KB (383 words) - 02:04, 12 February 2023
  • am NOT an admin. I am closing this discussion as permitted by Wikipedia:Deletion_process#Non-administrators_closing_discussions. Bwithh 13:30, 12 January...
    4 KB (546 words) - 07:58, 8 February 2022
  • (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RentAHitman.com) with the exactly same concern, and was unanimously kept. Per Wikipedia:Deletion process#Early closure, speedy...
    4 KB (419 words) - 07:30, 14 January 2022
  • deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was speedy keep. Page currently linked from main page: Wikipedia:Deletion...
    7 KB (848 words) - 16:56, 23 February 2022
  • it. To quote from Wikipedia:Deletion_process: "deletion is based upon policy and not personal likes and dislikes." and "So deletion is not a strict "count...
    11 KB (123,521 words) - 09:18, 5 April 2022
  • applicable text from WP:Deletion process.  Here it is again: Wikipedia:Deletion process states, "In certain situations, a deletion discussion may require...
    8 KB (895 words) - 16:03, 2 February 2022
  • or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was merge‎ to Bill Tiller. Per Wikipedia:Deletion_process#No_quorum...
    3 KB (260 words) - 22:11, 25 October 2023
  • seems to be the nominator's first visit to AfD so maybe a look at Wikipedia:Deletion process would help. As a non Twinkle user myself, I'm disappointed rather...
    4 KB (479 words) - 10:51, 13 August 2021
  • belong on Wikipedia. 17Drew 04:01, 28 July 2007 (UTC) Keep From Wikipedia: Deletion Process. "Wikipedia editors may find articles, images, or other pages...
    11 KB (105,661 words) - 09:25, 5 April 2022
  • --Malkinann (talk) 00:03, 10 October 2010 (UTC) To clarify this, per Wikipedia:Deletion_process#Process, I feel the page history should be retained for the possible...
    6 KB (56,970 words) - 15:30, 3 March 2023
  • guidelines: Wikipedia:Deletion policy – our deletion policy that describes how we delete things by consensus Wikipedia:Deletion process – our guidelines on...
    16 KB (336 words) - 08:46, 7 June 2024
  • of that. While it's not precisely relevant to this situation, Wikipedia:Deletion process says "Closing discussions in which you have offered an opinion...
    9 KB (85,886 words) - 00:43, 18 October 2022
  • --Malkinann (talk) 00:03, 10 October 2010 (UTC) To clarify this, per Wikipedia:Deletion_process#Process, I feel the page history should be retained for the possible...
    3 KB (298 words) - 07:35, 3 February 2022
  • Moving a merged article to the Talk namespace is described at Wikipedia:Deletion process#Redirects for discussion page and specifically as an alternative...
    9 KB (65,068 words) - 04:43, 5 April 2022
  • - Thanks. To those who are new to the wikipedia deletion process, please be aware that a nomination for deletion is not a call to arms to delete an article...
    10 KB (89,723 words) - 20:17, 18 October 2022
  • < 2011 September 27 Deletion review archives: 2011 September 2011 September 29 >...
    29 KB (11 words) - 18:13, 9 February 2023
  • procedure. To nominate a single page for deletion, you can use Twinkle, or follow these three steps: Wikipedia:Deletion policy Wikipedia:Deletion process...
    578 bytes (232 words) - 20:14, 6 December 2021
  • a number of times (but mostly at MfD). This is reinforced by Wikipedia:Deletion process#Other outcomes which shows that a number of possibilities exist...
    11 KB (63,424 words) - 13:26, 3 March 2023
  • < 2020 March 10 Deletion review archives: 2020 March 2020 March 12 >...
    15 KB (11 words) - 04:55, 19 August 2021
  • not familiar with how the Afd process works, please check out Wikipedia:Deletion process. WP:NOTEARLY addresses your specific question. Location (talk)...
    9 KB (75,115 words) - 15:28, 3 March 2023
  • case within the operation of a rule of law. aslo this was in the wikipedia deletion process page: "...However, it is not set in stone and should be treated...
    7 KB (86,398 words) - 20:15, 18 October 2022
  • --Malkinann (talk) 23:59, 9 October 2010 (UTC) To clarify this, per Wikipedia:Deletion_process#Process, I feel the page history should be retained for the possible...
    4 KB (323 words) - 08:10, 3 February 2022
  • --Malkinann (talk) 23:58, 9 October 2010 (UTC) To clarify this, per Wikipedia:Deletion_process#Process, I feel the page history should be retained for the possible...
    3 KB (322 words) - 08:24, 4 February 2022
  • Apr 8, 2005 (UTC) Please see CSD criterion G8 and please read Wikipedia:Deletion process. Uncle G 12:41, 2005 Apr 9 (UTC) Actually, i shan't reread the...
    4 KB (588 words) - 11:43, 24 April 2006
  • --Malkinann (talk) 00:11, 10 October 2010 (UTC) To clarify this, per Wikipedia:Deletion_process#Process, I feel the page history should be retained for the possible...
    4 KB (367 words) - 07:13, 3 February 2022
  • of Wikipedia:Speedy keep). Follow the directions at Wikipedia:Deletion process#Articles for deletion page. Cheers, cab 09:56, 5 September 2007 (UTC) The...
    3 KB (286 words) - 04:33, 6 February 2022
  • 2017 (UTC) Keep per Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions I think the time to close this discussion and remove the deletion banner at the top...
    8 KB (43,886 words) - 12:55, 3 March 2023
  • which was tagged for deletion with no legitimate effort made to improve the article, in violation of Wikipedia:Deletion process, and seems to be in violation...
    8 KB (59,256 words) - 00:39, 18 October 2022
  • per Wikipedia:Deletion_process. The nominator or any involved editor may implement the merge per Wikipedia:Merging#Merge_as_a_result_of_a_deletion_discussion...
    4 KB (481 words) - 21:13, 5 August 2023
  • it. To quote from Wikipedia:Deletion_process: "deletion is based upon policy and not personal likes and dislikes." and "So deletion is not a strict "count...
    20 KB (2,716 words) - 10:28, 11 February 2023
  • hominem attacks (and demonstrating your complete unfamiliarity with Wikipedia deletion process) instead of actually demonstrating the subject's notability. The...
    8 KB (77,569 words) - 20:16, 18 October 2022
  • --Malkinann (talk) 00:11, 10 October 2010 (UTC) To clarify this, per Wikipedia:Deletion_process#Process, I feel the page history should be retained for the possible...
    4 KB (360 words) - 08:41, 3 February 2022
  • Centralised deletion reform discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion reform If you need a page deleted, add the Category:Delete tag to it, and present your reasons...
    44 KB (6,613 words) - 16:34, 12 November 2022
  • --Malkinann (talk) 00:05, 10 October 2010 (UTC) To clarify this, per Wikipedia:Deletion_process#Process, I feel the page history should be retained for the possible...
    4 KB (394 words) - 06:27, 4 February 2022
  • only the minimum five days. You can help out if you want - see Wikipedia:Deletion_process#Non-administrators_closing_discussions. --Sam Blanning(talk) 00:31...
    15 KB (2,258 words) - 02:52, 5 February 2022
  • --Malkinann (talk) 00:06, 10 October 2010 (UTC) To clarify this, per Wikipedia:Deletion_process#Process, I feel the page history should be retained for the possible...
    4 KB (396 words) - 17:00, 2 February 2022
  • --Malkinann (talk) 00:00, 10 October 2010 (UTC) To clarify this, per Wikipedia:Deletion_process#Process, I feel the page history should be retained for the possible...
    4 KB (357 words) - 09:51, 3 February 2022
  • believe, quite clear and self-evident: Thou Shalt Not Use the Wikipedia Deletion Process As An Alternative Means of Winning an Editorial Dispute. It's...
    11 KB (99,303 words) - 20:16, 18 October 2022
  • GNG. Jenks24 (talk) 05:46, 17 November 2011 (UTC) Speedy Keep  Wikipedia:Deletion process#Early closure identifies as a speedy-keep criterion, "Nominations...
    6 KB (627 words) - 06:11, 7 March 2022
  • more.E.M.Gregory (talk) 08:41, 10 May 2017 (UTC) According to Wikipedia:Deletion process, "If there is a lack of comments, or the action to take is unclear...
    8 KB (50,095 words) - 12:34, 3 March 2023
  • of Wikipedia:Speedy keep). Follow the directions at Wikipedia:Deletion process#Articles for deletion page. Cheers, cab 09:56, 5 September 2007 (UTC) The...
    8 KB (94,942 words) - 09:47, 5 April 2022
  • with a mere 16 edits to his name, likely doesn't know much about Wikipedia deletion process, and "What has this country come to?" is in fact not a valid keep...
    6 KB (66,075 words) - 00:01, 18 October 2022
  • WP:CLOSEAFD and WP:GD but supported as a less common outcome at Wikipedia:Deletion_process#Other_Outcomes. Perhaps our policy pages need a copyedit. There...
    10 KB (54,102 words) - 13:45, 3 March 2023
  • a signature. Many of the ways one may !vote can be viewed at Wikipedia:Deletion process#Common outcomes. Best Regards, — Godsy (TALKCONT) 13:12, 15 March...
    5 KB (416 words) - 07:52, 24 May 2022
  • < 2021 July 19 Deletion review archives: 2021 July 2021 July 21 >...
    5 KB (11 words) - 01:04, 22 July 2021
  • going through Non-admin_closure and Wikipedia:Deletion_process#Non-administrators_closing_discussions. The deletion process says "Close calls and controversial...
    6 KB (68,631 words) - 04:55, 5 April 2022
  • and all other viewpoints expressed were for keep as well."   (Wikipedia:Deletion process#Non-administrators closing discussions) (And you're welcome :-)...
    8 KB (45,254 words) - 04:35, 5 April 2022
  • sure it will get sorted, there's probably just a backlog. See Wikipedia:Deletion process - you shouldn't close the discussion and decide a result yourself...
    6 KB (56,126 words) - 09:53, 5 April 2022
  • answer to your question anyway, Wikipedia:Deletion process has nothing prohibiting IPs from nominating articles for deletion. North America1000 02:40, 22...
    8 KB (49,390 words) - 12:56, 3 March 2023
  • DiverseMentality(Discuss it) 21:45, 26 July 2008 (UTC) Comment - As per Wikipedia:Deletion process: No consensus - default to keep --Technopat (talk) 23:09, 27 July...
    8 KB (84,549 words) - 05:00, 5 April 2022
  • of the nature of the website. More more information, look at Wikipedia:Deletion process. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 17:44, 12 September 2015 (UTC) Keep...
    8 KB (53,637 words) - 13:25, 3 March 2023
  • which was tagged for deletion with no legitimate effort made to improve the article, in violation of Wikipedia:Deletion process, and seems to be in violation...
    4 KB (384 words) - 23:13, 8 February 2023
  • you want to nominate those articles for deletion, feel free to. The instructions are at Wikipedia:Deletion process. "Deserving material" is not the criteria...
    7 KB (48,141 words) - 11:48, 3 March 2023
  • request for speedy deletion by the author under Wikipedia:Deletion process#Early closure, G7 speedy deletion qualifies for that. Yetisyny (talk) 10:38, 3...
    6 KB (33,874 words) - 05:18, 1 March 2023
  • keep information, not delete it. That is true for the entire Wikipedia deletion process. §FreeRangeFrog 19:27, 2 December 2012 (UTC) Comment Sorry Frog...
    8 KB (65,067 words) - 14:46, 3 March 2023
  • GNG. Jenks24 (talk) 05:46, 17 November 2011 (UTC) Speedy Keep  Wikipedia:Deletion process#Early closure identifies as a speedy-keep criterion, "Nominations...
    7 KB (50,119 words) - 15:10, 3 March 2023
  • added; and I didn't want to throw a new contributor into the Wikipedia deletion process if I can avoid it. But it looks like it's not being updated. I...
    8 KB (33,679 words) - 12:46, 3 March 2023
  • works, and ignoring the arguments that have been made above. Wikipedia:Deletion process#Common outcomes discusses a variety of available outcomes, including...
    7 KB (48,565 words) - 12:55, 3 March 2023
  • done: Wikipedia:Deletion process#Articles for deletion page & Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Redirection. Note the pages clearly assume that deletion & redirection...
    6 KB (666 words) - 06:48, 1 February 2022
  • decision based on the evidence here. For further info, please read Wikipedia:Deletion process. Regards, GiantSnowman 03:19, 29 March 2011 (UTC) OK, thanks for...
    8 KB (808 words) - 03:14, 1 February 2022
  • May 2007 (UTC) Actually, AFDs commonly end in redirection. See Wikipedia:Deletion_process#Non-administrators_closing_discussions, for example.--Chaser -...
    5 KB (59,747 words) - 09:36, 5 April 2022
  • users have divergent opinions. See Wikipedia:Deletion process § Common outcomes and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Administrator instructions for more...
    7 KB (73,909 words) - 12:55, 3 March 2023
  • request for speedy deletion by the author under Wikipedia:Deletion process#Early closure, G7 speedy deletion qualifies for that. Yetisyny (talk) 10:38, 3...
    4 KB (379 words) - 17:39, 3 September 2018
  • (UTC) Go ahead and speedy and close early as per WP:DP and per Wikipedia:Deletion_process#Early_closure in the speedy delete clause, you can close early...
    6 KB (37,643 words) - 15:05, 3 March 2023
  • --Malkinann (talk) 23:58, 9 October 2010 (UTC) To clarify this, per Wikipedia:Deletion_process#Process, I feel the page history should be retained for the possible...
    6 KB (40,751 words) - 10:58, 16 October 2010
  • Guide to deletion Centralized discussion Village pumps policy tech proposals idea lab WMF misc Titles of European monarchs "Gaza genocide" in Wikivoice...
    5 KB (41,922 words) - 20:02, 10 October 2020
  • made. Also I used these three guides (Wikipedia:Guide to deletion, Wikipedia:Deletion process, [[20]]) to learn how to use AfD. Flyingfishee (talk) 00:47...
    5 KB (24,128 words) - 10:21, 22 June 2020
  • things anyway? Melchoir 12:55, 17 March 2006 (UTC) Like this! See Wikipedia:Deletion process. Proto||type 13:18, 17 March 2006 (UTC) The above discussion is...
    2 KB (181 words) - 00:58, 7 February 2023
  • applicable text from WP:Deletion process.  Here it is again: Wikipedia:Deletion process states, "In certain situations, a deletion discussion may require...
    6 KB (36,104 words) - 15:06, 3 March 2023
  • it's obviously based on complete misunderstanding of both the Wikipedia deletion process and the search results.—J. M. (talk) 22:43, 23 September 2019...
    5 KB (530 words) - 18:51, 8 October 2019
  • < 2010 July 4 Deletion review archives: 2010 July 2010 July 6 >...
    17 KB (11 words) - 01:55, 25 March 2023
  • < 2010 December 2 Deletion review archives: 2010 December 2010 December 4 >...
    19 KB (11 words) - 19:15, 3 April 2023
  • page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was no consensus. Per Wikipedia:Deletion process#No quorum Ryan...
    7 KB (33,800 words) - 05:05, 1 March 2023
  • have searched Wikipedia:Deletion review, Wikipedia:Deletion review/Discussions, Wikipedia:Deletion process, and Wikipedia:Deletion policy to no avail. The...
    8 KB (48,213 words) - 14:44, 3 March 2023
  • TheJack15, so I'd like you to carefully read the guidelines at Wikipedia:Deletion process. - HyperGaruda (talk) 08:38, 25 December 2015 (UTC) Delete per...
    9 KB (63,868 words) - 13:45, 3 March 2023
  • procedural close.--Arxiloxos (talk) 00:29, 23 December 2016 (UTC) Wikipedia:Deletion process says procedural close shouldn't be used that way. Only when the...
    8 KB (40,820 words) - 13:19, 3 March 2023
  • Removing redlinks, if it has been decided to do this, is part of the Wikipedia:deletion process. Uncle G 16:14, 2005 Mar 17 (UTC) Delete. Dicdef. And remove links...
    3 KB (469 words) - 06:46, 24 April 2006
  • October 2012 (UTC) Process comment to an admin: Can we invoke Wikipedia:Deletion process#Snowball clause and get this AfD closed early please. This is...
    6 KB (625 words) - 03:47, 7 February 2023
  • article's author just because he disagrees. See Wikipedia:Deletion policy and Wikipedia:Deletion process. Doing so is considered unacceptable conduct and disruptive...
    7 KB (37,051 words) - 14:42, 3 March 2023
  • This is not a speedy deletion discussion, but rather an article for deletion discussion. Read: Wikipedia: Deletion process #Deletion discussions. Holdek...
    5 KB (30,250 words) - 14:07, 3 March 2023
  • Correction and mea culpa: I was wrong. The procedure outlined at Wikipedia:Deletion process#Non-administrators closing discussions is exactly the opposite...
    8 KB (45,642 words) - 13:48, 3 March 2023
  • but is ample: Die Zeit, Aesthetica, and HuffPost. The German Wikipedia deletion process appears to be a discussion rather than a vote. The discussion...
    7 KB (29,045 words) - 12:08, 3 March 2023
  • talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Speedy keep – Wikipedia:Deletion_process#Procedural_closure...
    5 KB (28,764 words) - 15:24, 3 March 2023
View (previous 100 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)